Experiments at a two-scale dynamo test facility

Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 552, Issue , 2006, Pages 419-440

  Muller U ^a   Stieglitz, R ^a   Horanyi, S ^b  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b KFKI ATOMIC ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; PERMANENT MAGNETS; TEST FACILITIES; TURBULENT FLOW;

DYNAMO MAGNETIC FIELD; LORENTZ FORCE; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC SLUG FLOW;

MAGNETIC FIELDS;

MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; PERMANENT MAGNETS; TEST FACILITIES; TURBULENT FLOW;

FLUID MECHANICS;

EID: 33645355930     PISSN: 00221120     EISSN: 14697645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006008779     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. 1986 Random Data Analysis and Measurement Procedures. Wiley-Interscience.
2. Biskamp, D. 1993 Nonlinear Magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
3. Branover, H. 1978 Magnetohydrodynamic Flow in Ducts. John Wiley.
4. Busse, F. H. 1992 Dynamo theory of planetary magnetism and laboratory experiments. In Evolution of Dynamical Structures in Complex Systems (ed. R. Friedrich & A. Wunderlin), 359-384. Springer.
5. Busse, F. H. 2000 Homogeneous dynamos in planetary cores and in the laboratory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 838-903.
6. Cardin, P., Brito, D., Jault, D., Nataf, H.-C. & Masso, J.-P. 2002 Towards a rapidly rotating liquid sodium dynamo experiment. Magnetohydrodynamics 38, 177-189.
7. Chossat, P., Armbruster, D. & Oprea, I. 2001 Dynamo and Dynamics, a Mathematical Challenge. NATO Science Series, Kluwer.
8. Gailitis, A., Lielausis, O., Dement'ev, S., Platacis, E., Cifersons, A., Gerbeth, G., Gundrum, T., Stefani F., Christen, M., Hänel, H. & Will, G. 2000 Detection of a flow induced eigenmode in the Riga dynamo facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4365-4369.
9. Gailitis, A., Lielausis, O., Karasev, B. G., Kinlov, L. R. & Ogorodnikov, A. P. 1989 The helical MHD-dynamo. In Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamics (ed. J. Lielpetris & R. Moreau), pp. 413-419. Kluwer.
10. Gailitis, A., Lielausis, O., Platacis, E., Gerbeth, G. & Stefani, F. 2001 The Riga dynamo experiment. In Dynamo and Dynamics, & Mathematical Challenge. (ed. P. Chossat, D. Armbruster, & I. Oprea), pp. 9-24. NATO Science Series, Kluwer.
11. Gailitis, A., Lielausis, O., Platacis, E., Gerbeth, G. & Stefani, F. 2002 Laboratory experiments on hydromagnetic dynamos. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 973-990.
12. Glatzmaier, G. A. & Roberts, P. H. 2002 Geodynamo, theoy and simulations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 1081-1123.
13. Herzenberg, A. 1958 Geomagnetic dynamos. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 250, 543-585.
14. Horanyi, S. & Krebs, L. 1988 Temperature compensated miniature permanent magnet flow-meter. First World Conference on Experimental Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics, Dubrovnik, September 4-9, 1988.
15. Iroshnikov, P. S. 1964 Turbulence of a conducting fluid in a strong magnetic field. Sov. Astron. 7, 566-571.
16. Kapulla, R., Sigg, B., Horanyi, S. & Hudina, M. 2000 Local velocity measurements in a thermallystratified sodium mixing layer using a permanent-magnet probe. Expl Thermal Fluid Sci. 20, 115-136.
17. Knebel, J. U. & Krebs, L. 1994 Calibration of a miniature permanent magnet flow meter probe and its application to velocity measurements in liquid sodium. Expl Thermal Fluid Sci. 8, 135-148.
18. Knebel, J. U., Krebs, L., Müller, U. & Axcell, B. P. 1998 Experimental investigation of a confined heated sodium jet in a co-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 368, 51-79.
19. Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 Local structure of turbulence in an incompressible fluid at very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 299-303.
20. Kraichnan, R. H. 1965 Inertial range spectrum in hydromagnetic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 8, 1385-1387.
21. Larmor, J. L. 1919 How could a rotating body such as the sun become a magnet? Report of the 87th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Bournemouth, Morray, London, pp. 159-160.
22. Lowes, F. J. & Wilkinson, I. 1968 Geomagnetic dynamo: An improved laboratory model. Nature 219, 717-718.
23. Moreau, R. 1990 Magnetohydrodynamics. Kluwer
24. Müller, U. & Stieglitz, R. 2000 Can the earth magnetic field be simulated in the laboratory?, Naturwissenschaften 87, 381-390.
25. Müller, U. Stieglitz, R. & Horanyi, S. 2004 A two-scale hydromagnetic dynamo experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 498, 31-71.
26. Ponomarenko, Y. B. 1973 The theory of the hydromagnetic generator. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 14, 775-778.
27. Rädler, K. H. 1999 From the Sun to the Great Attractor Guanajuato Lectures on Astrophysics. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer.
28. Rädler, K. H. & Cebers, A. (ed.) 2002 MHD Dynamo Experiments. Special issue of Magnetohydrodynamics 38, 3-218.
29. Rädler, K. H., Rheinhard, M., Apstein, E. & Fuchs, H. 2002a On the mean-field theory of the Karlsruhe dynamo experiment: 1. Kinetic theory. Magnetohydrodynamics 38, 41-71.
30. Rädler, K. H., Rheinhard, M., Apstein, E. & Fuchs, H. 2002b On the mean-field theory of the Karlsruhe dynamo experiment: 2. Back-reaction of the magnetic field on the fluid flow. Magnetohydrodynamics 38, 73-94.
31. Ricou, R. & Vives, Ch. 1982 Local velocity and mass transfer measurements in molten metal using an incorporated magnet probe. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 25, 1579-1588.
32. Rüdiger, G. & Hollerbach, R. 2004 The Magnetic Universe. Wiley-VCH.
33. Schlichting, H. 1958 Grenzschicht-Theorie. G. Braun, Karlsruhe.
34. Shercliff, J. A. 1965 A Textbook of Magnetohydrodynamics. Pergamon.
35. Stieglitz R. & Müller, U. 1996 Geodynamo: Eine Versuchsanlage zum Nachweis des homogenen Dynamoeffects. Wissenschaftlicher Bericht FZKA 5716.
36. Stieglitz, R. & Müller, U. 2001 Experimental demonstration of the homogeneous two-scale dynamo. Phys. Fluids 13, 561-564.
37. Tilgner, A. 2002 Numerical simulation of the onset of dynamo action in an experimental two-scale dynamo. Phys. Fluids 14, 4092-4094.
38. Weissenfluh, Th. 1985 Probes for local velocity and temperature measurements in liquid metal flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 28, 1563-1574.