Effect of compression wood on surface roughness and surface absorption of medium density fiberboard

Silva Fennica

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 161-167

  Akbulut, Turgay ^a   Ayrilmis, Nadir ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Compression wood; Medium density fiberboard; Surface analysis; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

COMPRESSION WOOD; MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

WOOD;

WOOD QUALITY;

ABSORPTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOOD;

PINUS NIGRA;

EID: 33645346776     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: 00375330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.358     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akbulut, T. & Koc, E. 2004. The effects of the panel density, panel temperature and cutter sharpness during edge machining on the roughness of the surface and profiled areas of medium density fiberboard. Forest Products Journal 54(12): 67-70.
2. _ , Hiziroglu, S. & Ayrilmis, N. 2000. Surface absorption, surface roughness, and formaldehyde emission of Turkish medium density fiberboard. Forest Products Journal 50(6): 45-48.
3. _ , Ayrilmis, N. & Koc, E. 2004. Influence of compression wood on physical and mechanical properties of medium density fiberboard. Wood Research Journal 49(3): 17-23.
4. Bekhta, P. & Hiziroglu, S. 2002. Theoretical approach on specific surface area of wood particles. Forest Products Journal 52(4): 72-76.
5. EMB (Euro MDF Board). 1993. A users manual. European Association of Medium Density Fiberboard Manufacturers, Giessen, Germany.
6. EN 323. 1993. Wood-based panels - determination of density. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
7. EN 382-1. 1993. Fiberboards - determination of surface absorbtion. Part 1: Test methods for dry process fiberboard. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
8. FPRL (Forest Products Research Lab.). 1956. Reaction wood (tension wood and compression wood). Leaflet 51, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Princes Risborough, England.
9. Gunther, B., Gotze, H., Luthardt, H. & Schultze-Dewitz, G. 1972. Eigenschaften und Verwendung des Astholzes von Kiefer (Pinus silvestris L.) und Rotbuche (Fagus silvatica L.). 3. Verwendung von Astholz der Kiefer für die Herstellung von Spanplatten. Holztechnologie 13: 80-87.
10. Hiziroglu, S. 1996. Surface roughness analysis of wood composites: a stylus method. Forest Products Journal 46(7/8): 67-72.
11. _ & Graham, M. 1998. Effect of press closing time and target thickness on surface roughness of particleboard. Forest Products Journal 48(3): 50-54.
12. International Standard ISO 4287. 1997. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - surface texture: profile method - terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. Keays, J.L. 1971. Complete-tree utilization. An analysis of the literature. III. Branches. Canadian Forest Service Report VP-X-71. 67 p.
14. Lehmann, W.F. & Geimer, R.L. 1974. Properties of structural particleboards from Douglas-fir forest residues. Forest Products Journal 24(10): 17-25.
15. Nicholls, J.W.P. 1982. Wind action, leaning trees and compression wood in Pinus radiata D Don. Australian Forest Research 12: 75-91.
16. Timell, T.E. 1986. Compression wood in gymnosperms. Vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany. 2150 p.