Critical evaluation of near-field seismic records in Greece

WIT Transactions on the Built Environment

Volumn 81, Issue , 2005, Pages 53-62

  Spyrakos, C C ^a   Maniatakis, Ch A ^a   Taflambas, J ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Aseismic codes; Near field ground motions; Seismic records

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; EARTHQUAKES; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

ASEISMIC CODES; CRITICAL EVALUATION; DAMAGE POTENTIAL; NEAR-FIELD GROUND MOTIONS; SEISMIC DEMANDS; SEISMIC RECORDS; STRONG EARTHQUAKES; STRONG GROUND MOTION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 33645335196     PISSN: 17433509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Earthquake Planning and Protection Organization, Greek Aseismic Code EAK2000. Athens, Greece, 2000.
2. Jennings, P.C., Ground motion parameters that influence structural damage, in Scholl, R.E. &King, J.L., eds Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Engineering Applications, EERI Publication 85-02, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California, 1985.
3. National Research Council, Review of recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis - guidance on uncertainty and use of experts, Panel on Seismic Hazard Analysis, Committee on Seismology, Board on Earth Sciences, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Resources, National Academy Press, Washington DC, pp. 73, 1997.
4. Benjamin, J.R. & Associates, A criterion for determining exceedance of the Operating Basis Earthquake, EPRI Report NP-5930, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, 1988.
5. Martinez-Pereira, A. & Bommer, J.J., What is the near-field?, Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, Booth editions, Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998.
6. Martinez-Pereira, A., The characterisation of near-field earthquake ground-motions for engineering design, Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, 1999.
7. Ambraseys, N.N., Dynamics and response of foundation materials in epicentral regions of strong earthquakes, Proc., Fifth World Conference in Earthquake Engineering, Rome, Vol I, cxxvi-cxlviii, 1974.
8. Hanks, T.C. & Johnson R.A., Geophysical assessment of peak accelerations, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 66, pp. 959-968, 1976.
9. Bertero, V.V., Mahin, S.A. & Herrera, R.A., Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 6, pp. 31-42, 1978.
10. Arias, A., A measure of earthquake intensity in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, Hansen, R. J., editor MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 438-483, 1970.
11. Benioff, H., The physical evaluation of seismic destructiveness, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 24, pp. 398-403, 1934.
12. Housner, G.W., Spectrum intensities of strong-motion earthquakes, Proc. Symp. Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 1952.
13. Martinez-Rueda, J.E., New applications of passive energy dissipation devices for the redesign of R.C. structures, Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, 1997.
14. Fajfar, P., Vidic, T. & Fischinger, M., A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 9, pp. 236-242, 1990.
15. Trifunac, M.D. & Brady, A.G., A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 65, pp. 581-626, 1975.
16. Husid, D.E., Caracteristicas de terremotos - Análysis general, Revista del IDIEM, Santiago de Chile, 8, pp. 21-42, 1969.
17. Mahin, S.A., Effects of duration and aftershocks on inelastic design earthquakes, Proc. Of Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, 5, pp. 677-680, 1980.
18. Krinitzky, E.L. & Chang, F.K., State of the art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States: Parameters for specifying intensity related earthquake ground motions, US Army Corps of Engineering Waterways Experiment Station, Report 25, 1987.
19. Papazachos, B. & Papazachou C., The earthquakes of Greece, Ziti editions, Thessaloniki, 1997.
20. Chopra, A.K. & Chintanapakdee, C., Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, pp 1769-1789, 2001.