New look at the cyclic storage systems; 1 - System definition and model formulation

WSEAS Transactions on Systems

Volumn 4, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2058-2065

  Alimohammadi, Saeed ^a   Afshar, Abbas ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cyclic storage; Distributed optimum design; Modified unit response matrix

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE WATERS;

CYCLIC STORAGE; DISTRIBUTED OPTIMUM DESIGN; MODIFIED UNIT RESPONSE MATRIX;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 33645319026     PISSN: 11092777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ambroggi, R. P., Underground reservoir to control the water cycle, Ground Water, Vol. 16, No. 3, 1978, pp. 158-166.
2. Barlow, P. M., Ahlfeld, D. P., and Dickerman, D.C., Conjunctive-management model for sustained yield of stream-aquifer systems, Jour Water Resour Plann. Manage., ASCE, Vol. 129, No. 1, 2003, pp. 35-48.
3. Basagaoglu, H., M. A. Marino, and R. H. Shumway, δ-Form. approximating problem for a conjunctive water resource management model, Advances in Water Resources, Vol. 23, 1999, pp. 69-81.
4. Bredehoeft, J. D., and Young, R. A., The temporal allocation of ground water- A simulation approach, Water Resour Res., Vol. 6, No. 1, 1970, pp. 3-21.
5. Buras, N., Conjunctive operation of dams and aquifers, J. Hydraulic Div., ASCE, Vol. 89, HY6, 1963, pp. 111-131.
6. Coe, J. J., Conjunctive use-advantages, constraints, and examples, J. Irr Drain. Eng. ASCE, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1990, pp. 427-443.
7. Czarnecki, J. B., Clark B. R., and Reed T. B., Conjunctive use optimization model of the Mississippi river valley alluvial aquifer of northern Arkansas, U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation Report 03-4230, 2003.
8. Lall, U., Yield model for screening surface and ground-water development, J. Water Res. Plan. Mang., ASCE, Vol. 121, No.1, 1995, pp. 9-21.
9. Lettenmaier, D. P., and Burges, S. J., Cyclic Storage: A preliminary analysis, Ground Water, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1982, pp.278-288.
10. Maddock III, T., Algebraic technological function from a simulation model, Water Resour Res., Vol. 8, No. 1, 1972, pp. 129-134.
11. McDonald, M.G., and Harbough, A.W., A modular three-dimensional finite difference groundwater flow model, U.S. Geological Survey, techniques of water resources invest, Book 6, 1988.
12. Morel-Seytoux, H. J., A Simple case of conjunctive surface-groundwater management, Ground Water, Vol. 13, No.6, 1975, pp. 505-515.
13. Nishikawa, T., Water resources optimization model for Santa Barbara, California, J. Water Res. Plann. Manage. ASCE, Vol. 124, No.5, 1998, pp. 252-263.
14. Philbrick, C. R., and Kitanidis P. K., Optimal conjunctive-use operations and plans, Water Resour. Res., Vol. 34, No.5, 1998, pp. 1307-1316.
15. Pulido, M. A., Conjunctive use opportunities in southern California, Thesis Submitted for Master of Science, Civil Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, 2003.
16. Reichard, E. G., Groundwater-surface water management with stochastic surface water supplies: simulation-optimization approach, Water Resour Res., Vol. 31, No. 11, 1995, pp. 2845-2865.
17. Syaukat, Y., and Fox, G. C., Conjunctive surface and ground water management in the Jakarta region, Indonesia, JAWRA, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2004, pp. 241-250.
18. Thomas, H. E., Cyclic Storage, where are you now? Ground Water, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1978, pp. 12-17.
19. Young, R. A., and J. D. Bredehoeft, Digital computer simulation for solving management problems of conjunctive groundwater and surface water systems, Water Resour Res. Vol. 8, No. 3, 1972, pp. 533-556.