Diffusion pattern of the use of genomic databases and analysis of biological sequences from 1970-2003: Bibliographic record analysis of 12 journals

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-50

  Shachak, Aviv ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; BIODIVERSITY; DATA HANDLING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROTEINS;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC RECORD ANALYSIS OF 12 JOURNALS; BIOLOGICAL COMMUNITY; DIFFUSION PATTERN;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

EID: 33645312960     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20251     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bartlett, J., & Toms, E.G. (2002). Capturing modeling and utilizing bioinformatics expertise. In E.G. Toms (Ed.), Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (pp. 564-565). Silver Spring, MD: Society for Information Science and Technology.
2. Ben-Dor, S., Butcher, S., Iyer, K.L., Kelso, J., Littlejohn, T., Shachak, A., et al. (2003, June). Training and support for bioinformatics: Theoretical and practical aspects. Paper presented at the Symposium on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB), Brisbane, Australia.
3. Bioinformatics Definition Committee. (2000). NIH working definition of bioinformatics and computational biology. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from http://www.bisti.nih.gov/CompuBioDef.pdf
4. Borbas, C. (2000). The role of clinical opinion leaders in guideline implementation and quality improvement. Chest, 118(2), 24S-32S.
5. Brown, C. (2003). The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(10), 926-938.
6. Buckingham, S. (2003). Bioinformatics: Programmed for success. Nature, 425, 209-215.
7. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
8. Dennis, C. (2003). Genomics: Compare and contrast. Nature, 426, 750-751.
9. Dillon, A., & Morris, M.G. (1996). User acceptance of information technology: Theories and models. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31, 3-32.
10. Garfield, E. (2002, November). Bioinformatics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://garfield.library.upenn. edu/papers/bio/bioinformatics112002.html
11. Gefen, D., & Straub, D.W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(8), 1-30.
12. Hauck, R. V., & Weisband, S. (2002). When a better interface and easy navigation aren't enough: Examining the information architecture in a law enforcement agency. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(10), 846-854.
13. Hemminger, B. (2002, November). Bioinformatics program summary. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://ils.unc.edu/bmh/bioinfo/ASIST02_bioinformatics_programs_summary.html
14. Kappelman, L.A., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Promoting information system success: The respective roles of user participation and user involvement. Journal of Information Technology Management, 3(1), 1-12.
15. Katoh, M. (2002). Paradigm shift in gene-finding method: From bench-top approach to desk-top approach. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 10(6), 677-682.
16. National Library of Medicine. (2002). MEDLINE. Retrieved July 22, 2005, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/databases/databases_medline.html
17. National Library of Medicine. (2003). Medical subject headings. Retrieved April 12, 2004, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html
18. Pinter, R.Y. (2003). Bioinformatics: A multidisciplinary challenge. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://infosoc.haifa.ac.il/ronpinter.ppt
19. Rice, R.E., & Webster, J. (2002). Adoption, diffusion and use of new media in organizational settings. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society (pp. 191-227). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
21. Shachak, A., & Fine, S. (2005). The effect of training on biologists' acceptance of bioinformatics tools. Unpublished manuscript.
22. Van de Ven, A.M., Polley, D.E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
24. Yarfitz, S., & Ketchell, D.S. (2000). A library-based bioinformatics services program. Bulletin of the Medical Libraries Association, 88(1), 36-48.