Comparative study of two watershed scale models to calculate diffuse phosphorus pollution

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 281-288

  Kovacs, A ^a  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

MONERIS; Non point pollution; Phosphorus; SWAT; Watershed modeling; Zala River catchment

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; RIVERS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; WATER POLLUTION;

NON-POINT POLLUTION; WATERSHED MODELING; ZALA RIVER;

WATERSHEDS;

PHOSPHOROUS ACID;

CATCHMENTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; RIVERS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; WATER POLLUTION; WATERSHEDS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; PHOSPHORUS; WATERSHED;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; SEDIMENT; SOIL EROSION; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; RIVERS; TIME FACTORS; WATER MOVEMENTS; WATER POLLUTANTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; HUNGARY; ZALA RIVER;

EID: 33645309366     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.062     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Arnold, J.G., Allen, P.M., Muttiah, K. and Bernhardt, G. (1995). Automated base flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water, 33(6), 1010-1018.
2. Behrendt, H., Huber, P., Kornmilch, M., Opitz, D., Schmoll, O., Scholz, G. and Uebe, R. (2000). Nutrient Emissions into River Basins of Germany. UBA-Text 23/00, Berlin, Germany.
3. Donigian, A. and Huber, C. (1991). Modeling of Nonpoint Source Water Quality in Urban and Non-urban Areas. Report No. 68-03-3513. US Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, USA.
4. FitzHugh, T.W. and Mackay, D.S. (2000). Impacts of input parameter spatial aggregation on an agricultural nonpoint source pollution model. Journal of Hydrology, 236(2000), 35-53.
5. Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Williams, J.R. and King, K.W. (2002). Soil and Water Assessment Tool. TWRI Report TR-191. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas, USA.
6. Novotny, V. (2003). Diffuse Pollution and Watershed Management. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, USA.
7. Schreiber, H., Behrendt, H., Constantinescu, L.T., Cvitanic, I., Drumea, D., Jabucar, D., Juran, S., Pataki, B., Snishko, S. and Zessner, M. (2005). Nutrient emissions from diffuse and point sources into the River Danube and its main tributaries for the period of 1998-2000 - results and problems. Wat. Sci. Tech., 51(3-4), 283-290.
8. Sisak, I. and Pomogyi, P. (1994). Investigation of the nutrient loads of the River Zala (in Hungarian). Hydraulic Engineering, 4(1994), 417-434.
9. Somlyody, L. and Hock, B. (2002). Water Quality and its Management. In Strategic Issues of the Hungarian Water Resources Management (in Hungarian), Somlyódy, L. (ed), Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 139-176.
10. Zessner, M., Postolache, C., Clement, A., Kovacs, A. and Strauss, P. (2005). Considerations on the influence of extreme events on the phosphorus transport from river catchments to the sea. Wat. Sci. Tech., 51(11), 193-204.