Generalized pointwise bias error bounds for response surface approximations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 65, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2035-2059

  Goel, Tushar ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^a   Papila, Melih ^a,b   Shyy, Wei ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bias error; Error bounds; Model appraisal; Pointwise error estimates; Response surface approximation; Surrogate errors

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; VECTORS;

BIAS ERROR; ERROR BOUNDS; MODEL APPRAISAL; POINTWISE ERROR ESTIMATES; RESPONSE SURFACE APPROXIMATION; SURROGATE ERRORS;

ERROR ANALYSIS;

ERROR ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION; VECTORS;

EID: 33645308250     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1532     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kaufman M, Balabanov V, Burgee SL, Giunta AA, Grossman B. Haftka RT, Mason WH, Watson LT. Variable-complexity response surface approximations for wing structural weight in HSCT design. Computational Mechanics 1996; 18(2):112-126.
2. Balabanov V, Kaufman M, Knill DL, Haim D, Golovidov O, Giunta AA, Grossman B, Mason WH, Watson LT, Haftka RT. Dependence of optimal Structural weight on aerodynamic shape for a high speed civil transport. Proceedings of 6th AIAA/NASA/USAF/ISSMO Symposium oil Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, AIAA-90-4046, September 1996; 599-612.
3. Balabanov V, Giunta AA, Golovidov O, Grossman B, Mason WH, Watson LT, Haftka RT. Reasonable design space approach to response surface approximation. Journal of Aircraft 1999; 36(1):308-315.
4. Papila M, Haftka RT. Uncertainty and wing structural weight approximations. Proceedings of 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures. Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference, St. Louis, MO, AIAA-99-1312, April 1999; 988-1002.
5. Papila M, Haftka RT. Response surface approximations: noise, error repair and modeling errors. AIAA Journal 2000; 38(12):2336-2343.
6. Hosder S, Watson LT, Grossman B, Mason WH, Kim H, Haftka RT, Cox SE. Polynomial response surface approximations for the multidisciplinary design optimization of a high speed civil transport. Optimization and Engineering 2001; 2(4):431-452.
7. Madsen JI, Shyy W, Haftka RT. Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization. AIAA Journal 2000; 38(9):1512-1518.
8. Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin LW, Huber F, Tran K. Preliminary design optimization for a supersonic turbine for rocket propulsion. Proceedings of 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, Alabama, AIAA-2000-3242, July 2000.
9. Papila N. Shyy W, Griffin LW, Dorney DJ. Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using global approximation methods. Journal of Propulsion and Power 2002; 18(3):509-518.
10. Shyy W, Tucker PK, Vaidyanathan R. Response surface and neural network techniques for rocket engine injector optimization. Journal of Propulsion and Power 2001; 17(2):391-401.
11. Shyy W, Papila N, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK. Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 2001; 37:59-118.
12. Vaidyanathan R, Papila N, Shyy W, Tucker PK, Griffin LW, Haftka RT, Fitz-Coy N. Neural network and response surface methodology for rocket engine component optimization. Proceedings of 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, AIAA-2000-4480, September 2000.
13. Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK, Papila N, Shyy W. Computational-fluid-dynamics based design optimization for single element rocket injector. Journal of Propulsion and Power 2004; 20(4):705-717 (also presented in 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA-2003-0296, January 2003).
14. Redhe M, Forsberg J, Jansson T, Marklund PO, Nilsson L. Using the response surface methodology and the D-optimality criterion in crashworthiness related problems: an analysis of the surface approximation error versus the number of function evaluations. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2002; 24(3): 185-194.
15. Redhe M, Eng L. Nilsson L. Using space mapping and surrogate models to optomize vehicle crashworthiness design. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSAMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5536, September 2002.
16. Craig KJ, Stander N, Dooge DA, Varadappa S. MDO of automotive vehicle for crashworthiness and NVH using response surface models. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5607, September 2002.
17. Rais-Rohani M, Singh MN. Efficient response surface approach for reliability estimation of composite structures. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5604, September 2002.
18. Rikards R, Auzins J. Response surface method in design optimization of carbon/epoxy stiffener shells. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5654, September 2002.
19. Vittal S, Hajela P. Confidence intervals for reliability estimated using response surface methods. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5475, September 2002.
20. Kim Y, Lee D, Kim Y, Yee K. Multidisciplinary design optimization of supersonic fighter wing using response surface methodology. Proceedings of 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA-2002-5408, September 2002.
21. Keane AJ. Wing optimization using design of experiments, response surface and data fusion methods. Journal of Aircraft 2003; 40(4):741-750.
22. Jun S, Jeon Y, Rho J, Lee D. Application of collaborative optimization using response surface methodology to an aircraft wing design. Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, AIAA-2004-4442, August-September 2004.
23. Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Haftka RT, Queipo NV, Shyy W, Tucker PK. Response surface approximation of pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, AIAA-2004-4501, August-September 2004.
24. Hill GA, Olson ED. Application of response surface-based methods to noise analysis in the conceptual design of revolutionary aircraft. Proceedings of 10th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, AIAA-2004-4437, August-September 2004.
25. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology-Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1995; 208-279.
26. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses (2nd edn). Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, 1996; 207-247.
27. Box GEP, Draper NR. The choice of a second order rotatable design. Biometrika 1963; 50(3):335-352.
28. Draper NR, Lawrence WE. Designs which minimize model inadequacies: cuboidal regions of interest. Biometrika 1965; 52(1-2):111-118.
29. Kupper LL, Meydrech EF. A new approach to mean squared error estimation of response surfaces. Biometrika 1973; 60(3):573-579.
30. Welch WJ. A mean squared error criterion for the design of experiments. Biometrika 1983; 70(1):205-213.
31. Venter G, Haftka RT. Minimum-bias based experimental design for constructing response surface in structural optimization. Proceedings of 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, AIAA-97-1053, Part 2, April 1997, 1225-1238.
32. Montepiedra G, Fedorov V. Minimum bias design with constraints. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1997; 63(1):97-111.
33. Palmer K, Tsui KL. A minimum bias Latin hypercube design. Institute of Industrial Engineers Transactions 2001; 33(9):793-808.
34. Qu X, Venter G, Haftka RT. New formulation of a minimum-bias central composite design and Gauss quadrature. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2004; 28(4):231-242.
35. Papila M, Haftka RT. Uncertainty and response surface approximations. Proceedings of 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Material Conference, Seattle, WA, AIAA-2001-1680, April 2001.
36. Papila M, Haftka RT, Watson LT. Pointwise bias error bounds and min-max design for response surface approximations. AIAA Journal 2005; 43(8):1797-1807.
37. MATLAB®. The Language of Technical Computing. Version 6.5 Release 13. © 1984-2002. The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA.