The influence of sourcing and relatedness on event integration

Discourse Processes

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-65

  Kim, Hyun Jeong Joyce ^a   Millis, Keith ^b  

^a RHODES COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645307085     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp4101_4     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Black, J. B., & Bern, H. (1981). Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 267-275.
2. Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence (pp. 209-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Foss, D. J. (1982). A discourse on semantic priming. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 590-607.
4. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). The Structure Building Framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of text understanding (pp. 289-311). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
7. Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C. A., Bayen, U. J., & Hu, X. (2000). Who said what? Who knows what? Tracking speakers and knowledge in narrative. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), Narrative perspective: Cognition and emotion (pp. 255-272). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8. Graesser, A. C., Bowers, C. A., Olde, B., & Pomeroy, V. (1999). Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 284-300.
9. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115-126.
11. Magliano, J. P., Zwaan, R. A., & Graesser, A. (1999). The role of situational continuity in narrative understanding. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 219-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Millis, K. K. (1995). Encoding discourse perspective during the reading of a literary text. Poetics, 23, 235-253.
13. Millis, K. K., King, A., & Kim, H.-J. J. (2000). Updating situation models from descriptive texts: A test of the situational operator model. Discourse Processes, 30, 201-236.
14. Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453-465.
15. Potts, G. R., John, M. F., & Kirson, D. (1989). Incorporating new information into existing world knowledge. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 303-333.
16. Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478-493.
17. Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279-294.
18. Tapiero, I., van den Broek, P., & Quintana, M. (2002). The mental representation of narrative texts as networks: The role of necessity and sufficiency in the detection of different types of causal relations. Discourse Processes, 34, 237-258.
19. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
20. van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
21. Wineburg, S. S. (1994). The cognitive representation of historical texts. In G. Leinhardt, I. Beck, & C. Stainton (Eds.), Teaching and learning in history (pp. 85-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.
23. Zwaan, R. A., Langsten, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 21, 292-297.
24. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386-397.
25. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.
26. Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1994). Spatial information and naturalistic story comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 97-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.