Informal communication and the development of scientific fields

Social Science Information

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1973, Pages 63-75

  Van Rossum, Wouter ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645293533     PISSN: 05390184     EISSN: 14617412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/053901847301200603     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Becker H. Usteem R.H. 1942 “Sociological analysis of the dyad”, American sociological review 7: 13–26.
2. Campbell D.T. 1969 “Ethnocentrism of disciplines and the fish-scale model of omniscience”, in: SherifM. Sherif; C.W.,(eds.). Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences. Chicago, Ill., Aldine.
3. Clark T.N. 1972 “The stages of scientific institutionalization”, International social science journal 24: 658–670.
4. Cole S. 1970 “Professional standing and the reception of scientific discoveries”, American journal of sociology 76: 286–306.
5. Crane D. 1969 “Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the ‘Invisible College’ hypothesis”, American sociological review 34: 335–352.
6. 1972 Invisible Colleges. Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press.
7. Gaston J. 1972 “Communication and the reward system of science: A study of a national ‘Invisible College’”, pp. 25–41 in: Halmos P.,(ed.). The sociological review monograph 18. (The sociology of science.)
8. Gouldner A.W. 1970 The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York, Heinemann.
9. Heyl B.S. 1968 “The Harvard ‘Pareto circle’”, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences 41: 316–334.
10. Klima R. 1971 “Theorienpluralismus in der Soziologie”, in: DiemerA.,(ed.). Der Methoden- und Theorienpluralismus in den Wissenschaften. Meissenheim-am-Glan, Anton Hain.
11. 1973 “Scientific knowledge and social control in science”, in: WhitleyR.D.,(ed.). Social processes of scientific development. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (A paper read at the ISA Research Committee conference on the Sociology of Science, London, September 1972.)
12. Krantz D.L. 1972 “Schools and systems: The mutual operation of operant and non-operant psychology as a case study”, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences 8: 86–102.
13. Kuhn T.S. 1957 The Copernican revolution. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
14. 1970 The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press. (2nd enlarged ed.).
15. Lammen C.J. 1973 “Development differences between natural and social sciences”, in: WhitleyR.D.,(ed.). Social processes of scientific development. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. (A paper read at the ISA Research Committee conference on the Sociology of Science, London, September 1972.)
16. Lazarsfeld P.F. Merton R.K. 1954 “Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis”, in: BergerM.,etal(eds.). Freedom and control in modern society. New York, Van Nostrand.
17. Merton R.K. 1972 “Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge”, American journal of sociology 78: 9–47.
18. Mulkay M. 1972a “Cultural growth in science”, pp. 126–142 in: BarnesB.,(ed.). Sociology of science. Harmondsworth, Penguin books.
19. 1972b The social process of innovation. London, Macmillan.
20. Mullins N.C. 1966 Social networks among biological scientists. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.)
21. Newcomb T. 1961 The acquaintance process. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Phillips D.L. 1973 “Paradigms and falsification”, chap. 7 in: Abandoning method. San Francisco, Calif., Jossey Bass.
23. Polanyi M. 1964 Personal knowledge. New York, Harper.
24. Whitley R.D. 1972 “Black boxism and the sociology of science: A discussion of the major developments in the field”, pp. 61–92 in: Halmos P.,(ed.). The sociological review monograph 18. (The sociology of science.)
25. Ziman J. 1968 Public knowledge: The social dimension of science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.