Automated parallel test construction for personnel selection;Automatisierte parelleltestkonstruktion für die personalauswahl

Zeitschrift fur Personalpsychologie

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 28-38

  Zierke, Oliver ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automated test construction; Classical test theory; Computer based testing; Itembank; Knowlege test; Tau equivalence

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645290185     PISSN: 16176391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/1617-6391.4.1.28     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adam, N. & Zierke, O. (2002). Automatisierte Paralleltestkonstruktion "APART" (Software-Programm). Hamburg: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt.
2. Adema, J. & van der Linden, W. (1989). Algorithms for computerized test construction using classical item parameters. Journal of Educational Statistics, 14, 279-290.
3. Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H. & Wu, I.-L (1992). An automated test development of parallel tests from a seed test. Psychometrika, 57, 271-288.
4. Armstrong, R. D., Jones, D. H. & Wang, Z. (1994). Automated parallel test construction using classical test theory. Journal of Educational Statistics, 19, 73-90.
5. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W. & Weiber, R. (1996). Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Berlin: Springer.
6. Dahlkamp, J. & Ludwig, U. (2004). Richtig unter Dampf. Der Spiegel, 7, 46-47.
7. Fan, X. (1998). Item response theory and classical test theory: an empirical comparison of their item/person statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 357-381.
8. Gibson, W. & Weiner, J. A. (1996). Licensing and certification test construction: a balancing act. Clear Exam Review, 7, 23-27.
9. Gibson, W. & Weiner, J. A. (1998). Generating random parallel test forms using CTT in a computer-based environment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 297-310.
10. Green, B. F. (2000). System design and operation. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Computerized adaptive testing: A primer (2nd ed., pp. 23-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York, NY: Wiley.
12. Hesse, J. & Schrader, H. C. (1998). Testtraining 2000. Frankfurt: Eichborn.
13. Hesse, J., Schrader, H. C. & Roelecke, C. (2002). Der Pilotentest. Frankfurt: Eichborn.
14. Impara, J. C. (1995). Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices. Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
15. Klauer, K. J. (1987). Kriteriumsorientierte Tests: Lehrbuch der Theorie und Praxis lehrzielorientierten Messens. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
16. Lienert, G. & Raatz, U. (1994). Testaufbau und Testanalyse. (5. Aufl.) Weinheim: Beltz.
17. Linden, W. van der & Glas, A. W. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. Linden, W. van der (2003). Automated test assembly systems. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 123-128). London: Sage.
19. Lord, F. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Item sampling in test theory and in research design. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Ed.), Statistical theories of mental test scores. (pp. 234-260). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20. MacDonald, P. & Paunonen, S. V. (2002). A Monte Carlo comparison of item and person statistics based on item response theory versus classical test theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 921-943.
21. Melter, A., Hamann, I., Kutschke, T. & Storm, E.-G. (2002). Modernisierung der Eignungsdiagnostik im Psychologischen Dienst der Bundeswehr - Ergebnisse und Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 1, 35-41.
22. Rosenfeld, M., Tannenbaum, R. J. & Wesley, S. (1995). Policy issues with psychometric implications. In J. C. Impara (Ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices (pp. 59-87). Lincoln: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.
23. Sands, W. A., Waters, B. K. & McBride, J. R. (1997). Computerized adaptive testing: From inquiry to operation. Washington, DC: APA.
24. Steyer, R. & Eid, M. (1993). Messen und Testen. Berlin: Springer.
25. Sun, K.-T. (2001). A greedy approach to test construction problems. Proceedings National Science Council ROC(D), 11, 78-87.
26. Vale, C. D. (1996). Generation of equivalent unique conventional test forms. Paper presented at the SIOP conference, San Diego, CA.
27. Wainer, H. (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: A primer. (2nd ed.) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Way, W. & Gorham, J. (2003). Computer-based testing. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 258-263). London: Sage.