Eyewitnesses: A comparison of live, video, and photo line-ups

Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 15-22

  Kerstholt, José H ^a   Koster, Erwin R ^a   van Amelsvoort, Adri G ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b LSOP Police Education and Knowledge Centre   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645240021     PISSN: 08820783     EISSN: 19366469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02813869     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bothwell, R. K., Brigham J. C., & Deffenbacher, K. A. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
2. Cutler, B. L., Berman, G. L., Penrod, S., & Fisher, R. P. (1994). Conceptual, practical, and empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read and M. D. Toglia (eds.): Adult eyewitness testing: current trends and developments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cutler, B. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1990). Live line-ups, videotaped line-ups, and photoarrays. Forensic Reports, 2, 93-106.
4. Cutler, B. L., Fisher, R. P., & Chicvara, C. L. (1989). Eyewitness identification from live versus videotaped line-ups. Forensic Reports, 2, 93-106.
5. Cutler, B. L., Fisher, R. P., & Chicvara, C. L. (1989). Eyewitness identification from live versus videotaped line-ups. Forensic Reports, 2, 93-106.
6. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: line-up construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.
7. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637.
8. Dent, H. R. (1977). Stress as a factor influencing person recognition in identification parades. Bulletin of British Psychology, 30, 339-340.
9. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835.
10. Edwards, K. (1998). The face of time: Temporal cues in facial expressions of emotions. Psychological Science, 9, 270-276.
11. Kerstholt, J. H., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Valeton, J. M. (1992). The effect of expectation on the identification of known and unknown persons. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 173-180.
12. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from line-ups: simultaneous versus sequential line-up presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
13. O'Rourke, T. E., Penrod, S. D., Cutler, B. L. & Stuve, T. E. (1989). The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 385-395.
14. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
15. Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential line-ups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22-33.
16. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence and accuracy: a meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
17. Wagenaar, W. A. (1969). Note on the construction of digram-balanced latin squares. Psychological Bulletin, 72, 384-386.