A powertype-based metamodelling framework

Software and Systems Modeling

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 72-90

  Gonzalez Perez, Cesar ^a   Henderson Sellers, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Metamodelling; Powertype; Software development methodologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645227668     PISSN: 16191366     EISSN: 16191374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-005-0099-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Atkinson, C.: Supporting and applying the UML conceptual framework. The Unified Modeling Language. In: Bézivin, J., Muller, P.-A. (eds.) 〈UML〉 1998: Beyond the Notation LNCS 1618, pp. 21-36. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1998)
2. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Rearchitecting the UML infrastructure. ACM Trans. Modeling and Computer Simulation 12 (4), 290-321 (2002)
3. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Processes and products in a multi-level metamodeling architecture. Int. J. Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng. 11 (6), 761-783 (2001)
4. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: The essence of multilevel metamodelling. In: Gogolla, M., Kobryn, C. (eds.) 〈UML〉 2001 - The Unified Modeling Language. Modeling Languages, Concepts and Tools LNCS 2185, pp. 19-33. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2001)
5. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Meta-level independent modelling. International Workshop on Model Engineering at the 14th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming 2002. Sophia Antipolis and Cannes, France (2000)
6. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Strict profiles: Why and how. In: Evans, A., Kent, S., Selic, B. (eds.) 〈UML〉 2000 - The Unified Modeling Language. Advancing the Standard LNCS 1939, pp. 309-322. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2000)
7. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T.: Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Software 20 (5), 36-41 (2003)
8. Dahchour, M., Pirotte, A.: Materialization and its metaclass implementation. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. 14 (5), 1078-1094 (2002)
9. D'Souza, F.D., Wills, A.C.: Objects, Components, and Frameworks with UML: The Catalysis Approach. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1999)
10. Duncan, W.R.: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Project Management Institute. 176 pp. PA, USA (1996)
11. Firesmith, D., Henderson-Sellers, B.: The OPEN Process Framework - An Introduction. Addison-Wesley, Harlow, UK (2002)
12. Gonzalez-Perez, C., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Templates and resources in software development methodologies. J. Obj. Technol. 4 (4), 173-190 (2005)
13. Henderson-Sellers, B., Unhelkar, B.: OPEN Modeling with UML. 245 pp. Addison-Wesley, London (2000)
14. Martin, J., Odell, J.J.: Object-Oriented Methods: A Foundation. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA (1995)
15. Martin, J., Odell, J.J.: Object-Oriented Methods: A Foundation (UML). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1998)
16. Odell, J.J.: Power types. Journal of Object-Oriented Programming 7 (2), 8-12 (1994)
17. OMG 2002. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, version 1.4. OMG document formal/2002-04-03. http://www.omg.org, accessed 12th (July 2002)
18. OMG 2001. OMG Unified Modelling Language Specification, version 1.4. OMG documents formal/01-09-68 through 80 (13 documents). http://www.omg.org, accessed 12th (July 2002)
19. OMG 2001. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification. OMG document ptc/2002-01-23. http://www.omg.org, accessed 12th (July 2002)
20. OMG 2003, SPEM 2.0 RFP draft. OMG document ad/03-09-02, http://www.omg.org, accessed 6th (October 2003)
21. Pirotte, A., Zimányi, E., Massart, D., Yakusheva, T.: Materialization: A powerful and ubiquitous abstraction pattern. In: Bocca, J., Jarke, M., Zaniolo, C. (eds.) Procs. 20th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '94) pp. 630-641 (1994)
22. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., Benjamen, A.: A multi-model view of process modelling. Requirements Eng. J. 4 (4), 169-187 (1999)
23. Seidewitz, E.: What models means. IEEE Software 20 (5), 26-31 (2003)
24. Standards Australia, Standard Metamodel for Software Development Methodologies. AS 4651-2004, Standards Australia (2004)