Effective copper surface area of IUDs [9]

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 54-

  Wildemeersch, Dirk ^a  

^a Gynecological Outpatient Clinic and IUD Training Center   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER;

BLEEDING; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PAIN; PREGNANCY RATE; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE;

COPPER; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES;

EID: 33645224976     PISSN: 14711893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1783/147118906775275082     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Kosonen A. Corrosion of copper in utero. In: Hafez ESE, van Os W (eds), Medicated Intrauterine Devices. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 1980; 22-29.
2. Wagner H. Intrauterine contraception: past present and future. In: Rabe T, Runnebaum B (eds), Fertility Control: Update and Trends. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1999: 151-171.
3. Chantler EN. Copper loss from copper IUDs. In: Zatuchni GI, Goldsmith A, Sciarra JJ (eds), Intrauterine Contraception: Advances and Future Prospects. Philadelphia, PA: Harper & Row, 1984; 198-210.
4. Cao X, Zhang W, Zhao X, Lin N, Wang L, Li C, et al. Three-year efficacy and acceptability of the GyneFix® 200 intrauterine system (IUS). Contraception 2004; 69: 207-211.
5. 2 and users of a copper-Ievonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception 2004; 70: 169-172.