Voltage probe model of spin decay in a chaotic quantum dot with applications to spin-flip noise and entanglement production

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 11, 2006, Pages

  Michaelis, B ^a   Beenakker, C W J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645224286     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115329     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M. Büttiker, IBM J. Res. Dev. IBMJAE 0018-8646 32, 63 (1988).
2. C. W. J. Beenakker, M. Kindermann, C. M. Marcus, and A. Yacoby, in Fundamental Problems of Mesoscopic Physics: Interactions and Decoherence, edited by, I. V. Lerner,,, B. L. Altshuler,, and, Y. Gefen,, NATO Science Series II, Vol. 154 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2004).
3. The absence of energy exchange with the reservoir (energy conserving voltage probe) is appropriate for quasi-elastic scattering. Alternatively, one may require only that no particles are exchanged with the reservoir (dissipative voltage probe), in order to model inelastic scattering. The effect of inelastic scattering on entanglement has been studied by E. Prada, F. Taddei, and R. Fazio, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125333 72, 125333 (2005).
4. C. W. J. Beenakker and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.1889 46, R1889 (1992).
5. M. J. M. de Jong and C. W. J. Beenakker, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/0378-4371(96)00068-4 230, 219 (1996).
6. A. A. Clerk and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.245303 69, 245303 (2004).
7. V. S.-W. Chung, P. Samuelsson, and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125320 72, 125320 (2005).
8. M. L. Polianski, P. Samuelsson, and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.161302 72, 161302 (R) (2005).
9. S. Pilgram, P. Samuelsson, H. Förster, and M. Büttiker, cond-mat/0512276 (unpublished).
10. G. Seelig and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.245313 64, 245313 (2001).
11. F. Marquardt and C. Bruder, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.125305 70, 125305 (2004).
12. F. Marquardt, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 72, 788 (2005).
13. C. W. J. Beenakker and B. Michaelis, J. Phys. A JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/38/49/011 38, 10639 (2005).
14. V. N. Golovach, A. Khaetskii, and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.016601 93, 016601 (2004).
15. W. A. Coish and D. Loss, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.125337 72, 125337 (2005).
16. M. Borhani, V. N. Golovach, and D. Loss, cond-mat/0510758 (unpublished).
17. W. M. Witzel and S. Das Sarma, cond-mat/0512323 (unpublished).
18. C. W. J. Beenakker, C. Emary, M. Kindermann, and J. L. van Velsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147901 91, 147901 (2003).
19. C. W. J. Beenakker, cond-mat/0508488 (unpublished).
20. J. L. van Velsen, M. Kindermann, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Turk. J. Phys. TJPHEY 1300-0101 27, 323 (2003).
21. P. Samuelsson, E. Sukhorukov, and M. Büttiker, Turk. J. Phys. TJPHEY 1300-0101 27, 481 (2003).
22. C. W. J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys. 69.731 69, 731 (1997).
23. O. Sauret and D. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.106601 92, 106601 (2004).
24. N. M. Chtchelkatchev, G. Blatter, G. B. Lesovik, and T. Martin, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.161320 66, 161320 (R) (2002).
25. P. Samuelsson, E. V. Sukhorukov, and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.026805 92, 026805 (2004).
26. P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.4695 55, 4695 (1997);
27. P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.209901 66, 209901 (E) (2002).
28. R. F. Werner, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4277 40, 4277 (1989).
29. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80. 2245 80, 2245 (1998).
30. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.12485 46, 12485 (1992).
31. G. B. Lesovik, JETP Lett. JTPLA2 0021-3640 49, 592 (1989).
32. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 65.2901 65, 2901 (1990).
33. For a study of entanglement production in a quantum dot with strong spin-orbit scattering, see D. Frustaglia, S. Montangero, and R. Fazio, cond-mat/0511555 (unpublished).
34. C. W. J. Beenakker and P. W. Brouwer, Physica E (Amsterdam) PELNFM 1386-9477 10.1016/S1386-9477(00)00245-9 9, 463 (2001).
35. R. A. Jalabert, J.-L. Pichard, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 27, 255 (1994).
36. E. G. Mishchenko, A. Brataas, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.073305 69, 073305 (2004).
37. J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1116955 309, 2180 (2005).
38. X. Wang and P. Zanardi, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00885-X 301, 1 (2002).
39. P. Samuelsson and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.041305 73, 041305 (2006).