Statistical model of variable allometric growth: Otolith growth in Micropogonias furnieri (Actinopterygii, Sciaenidae)

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 196-208

  Bervian, G ^a   Fontoura, N F ^a   Haimovici, M ^b  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Micropogonias furnieri; Otolith; Relative growth; Statistical models; Variable allometric growth

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; GROWTH; GROWTH MODELING; OTOLITH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ACTINOPTERYGII; ARGYROSOMUS MACROPHTHALMUS; MICROPOGONIAS FURNIERI; SCIAENIDAE;

EID: 33645222416     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.00890.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Campana S. W. (1990). How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths¿ Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47, 2219 2227.
2. Casselman J. M. (1990). Growth and relative size of calcified structures of fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 119, 673 688.
3. Castello J. P. (1986). Distribución, crecimiento y maduración sexual de la corvina juvenil (Micropogonias furnieri) en el estuário de la Lagoa dos Patos, Brasil. Physis 44, 21 36.
4. Forbes T. L. Lopez G. R. (1989). Determination of critical periods in ontogenetic trajectories. Functional Ecology 3, 625 632.
5. Francis R. I. C. C. (1990). Back-calculation of fish length, a critical review. Journal of Fish Biology 36, 883 902.
6. Fukuwaka M. Kaeriyama M. (1997). Scale analyses to estimate somatic growth in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54, 631 636.
7. Gould S. J. (1966). Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Review 41, 587 640.
8. Haimovici M. Velasco G. (2000). Length-weight relationship of marine fishes from Southern Brazil. Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly 23 (Suppl. 1) 19 23.
9. Hare J. A. Cowen R. K. (1995). Effect of age, growth rate, and ontogeny on the otolith size - fish size relationship in bluefish, Pomatotus saltatrix, and the implications for back-calculation of size in fish early life history stages. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52, 1909 1922.
10. Hartnoll R. G. (1978). The determination of relative growth in crustacean. Crustaceana 34 (Suppl. 3) 281 293.
11. Hartnoll R. G. (1982). Growth. In The Biology of Crustacea. Embryology, Morphology and Genetics Abele L. G ed.) pp. 111 196. New York Academic Press.
12. Huxley J. S. (1924). Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance. Nature 14, 896 897.
13. Isaac V. J. (1988). Synopsis of biological data on the whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri(Desmarest, l823). FAO Fisheries Synopsis 150.
14. Jolicoeur P. (1989). A simplified model for complex bivariate allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 140, 41 49.
15. Le Cren E. D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology 20, 201 219.
16. Lleonart J. Salat J. Torres G. (2000). Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205, 85 93.
17. Lovett D. Felder D. L. (1989). Application of regression techniques to studies of relative growth in crustaceans. Journal of Crustacean Biology 9 (Suppl. 4) 529 539.
18. Mosegaard H. Svedang H. Taberman K. (1988). Uncoupling of somatic and otolith growth rates in Artic char (Salvelinus alpinus) as an effect of differences in temperature response. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45, 1514 1524.
19. Needham J. (1950). The form-transformation of the abdomen of the female pea-crab Pinnotheres pisum Leach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 137, 115 136.
20. Reznick D. Lindbeck E. Bryga H. (1989). Slower growth results in larger otoliths, an experimental test with guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46, 108 112.
21. Ricker W. E. (1975). Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191.
22. Secor D. H. Dean J. M. (1989). Somatic growth effects on the otolith-fish size relationship in young pond-reared striped bass, Morone saxatilis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46, 113 121.
23. Smith R. J. (1980). Rethinking allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 87, 97 111.
24. Smith R. J. (1993). Logarithmic transformation bias in allometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 90, 215 228.
25. Sommerton D. A. (1980). A computer technique for estimating the size at sexual maturity in crabs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37, 1488 1494.
26. Strauss R. E. (1993). The study of allometry since Huxley. In Problems of Relative Growth Huxley J. S. ed.) pp. xlvii lxxv. Baltimore, MD The John Hopkins University Press.
27. Swain D. P. Foote C. J. (1999). Stocks and chameleons: the use of phenotypic variation in stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 113 128.
28. Vazzoler A. E. A. M. (1971). Diversificação fisiológica e morfológica de Micropogonias furnieri(Desmarest, 1823) da costa do Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico 20 (Suppl. 2) 1 70.
29. Vazzoler A. E. A. M. (1991). Síntese de conhecimentos sobre a biologia da corvina Micropoginias furnieri(Desmarest, 1823), da costa do Brasil. Atlântica 13, 55 74.
30. Vizziano D. Forni F. Saona G. Norbis W. (2002). Reproduction of Micropogonias furnieri in a shallow temperate coastal lagoon in the southern Atlantic. Journal of Fish Biology 61 (Suppl. A) 196 206. doi:10.1006/jfbi.2002. 2077
31. Volpedo A. Echeverría D. D. (2003). Ecomorphological patterns of the sagitta in fish on the continental shelf off Argentine. Fisheries Research 60, 551 560.
32. Weatherley A. H. (1972). Growth and Ecology of Fish Populations. London Academic Press.
33. White J. F. Gould S. J. (1965). Interpretation of the coefficient in the allometric equation. American Naturalist 99, 5 18.
34. Zivkov M. (1996). Critique of proportional hypothesis and methods for back-calculation of fish growth. Environmental Biology of Fishes 46, 309 320.