Institutional determinants of Indonesia's sugar trade policy

Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 95-103

  Stapleton, Tim ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUGAR; TRADE POLICY;

ASIA; EURASIA; INDONESIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA;

SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 33645216118     PISSN: 00074918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00074910600632401     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abidin, Z. and Ismono, H.(2004) The impact of government policy on the competitiveness of sugarcane farming in Lampung Province. In. University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung. Unpublished paper
2. ADB (Asian Development Bank).(2004) Country Governance Assessment Report. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
3. Asia Foundation and World Bank.(2005) Improving the Business Environment in East Java: Views from the Private Sector. Jakarta
4. Athukorala, P. (2002) Survey of recent developments Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 38(2), pp. 141-62.
5. Basri, C. and Hill, H. (2004) Ideas, interests and oil prices: The political economy of trade reform during Soeharto's Indonesia The World Economy, 27(5), pp. 633-55.
6. Basri, C. and Soesastro, H. (2005) The political economy of trade policy in Indonesia ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(1), pp. 3-18.
7. Boediono. (2005) Managing the Indonesian economy: Some lessons from the past Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), pp. 309-24.
8. Iqbal, M. and Rusastra, W. and Suprihatini, R.(1999). 'The sugar development strategy with an economic crisis and competitive markets'. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR. In [pp. 1-29].. Indonesia Research Project Working Paper 99.19:
9. Keohane, R. and Milner, H.(1996) Internationalisation and Domestic Politics. In. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Liu, M.-C. (2002) Determinants of Taiwan's trade liberalization: The case of a newly industrialized country World Development, 30(6), pp. 975-89.
11. MacIntyre, A.(2003) The Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance. In. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
12. MacIntyre, A. and Resosudarmo, B. (2003) Survey of recent developments Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), pp. 133-56.
13. Marks, S. (2004) Survey of recent developments Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 40(2), pp. 151-75.
14. McLeod, R. (2005a) Survey of recent developments Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(2), pp. 133-56.
15. McLeod, R. (2005b) The struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), pp. 367-86.
16. Nelson, G. and Panggabean, M. (1991) The costs of Indonesian sugar policy: A policy analysis matrix approach American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(3), pp. 703-12.
17. Ordon, D. and Thomas, M.(2004). 'Agricultural policies in Indonesia: producer support estimates 1985-2003'. MTID (Markets, Trade, and Institutions Division. In [pp.].. Discussion Paper No. 78
18. Riker, W. (1980) Implications from the disequilibrium of majority rule for the study of institutions American Political Science Review, 74, pp. 432-46.
19. Stapleton, T. (2005) The political economy of Indonesian trade policy: the case of sugar, available at: http://members.optusnet.com.au/stapes/PolEcoIndoSugarTradePolicy.pdf.
20. USDA-ERS (Economic Research Service of the US Department of Agriculture).(2003) World Sugar Policy Review. In Sugar and Sweeteners Outlook/SSS-236/31 January..
21. World Bank.(2005) Regaining Competitiveness. In Indonesia Policy Brief.. Jakarta: World Bank.
22. WTO (World Trade Organization).(2005).. Trade Policy Review Indonesia: Minutes of Meeting Addendum. In [pp. 1-105].. WT/TPR/M/117/Add.1, WTO Trade Policy Review Body