Limits to growth: Remote regions, remote institutions

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 147-155

  Huskey, Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC GROWTH; ISOLATION EFFECT; LIMITING FACTOR;

EID: 33645214766     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-005-0043-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001a) Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 8460. NBER, Cambridge
2. Acemoglu D, Johnson S, Robinson J (2001b) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. Am Econ Rev 91: 1369-1401
3. Acemoglu D (2003) Root causes: A historical approach to assessing the role of institutions in economic development. Finance and Development June:27-30
4. Ainana L, Zelensky M, Bychkov V, Zagrebin I (1999) Preservation and development of the subsistence lifestyle and traditional use of natural resources by native people in several coastal communities of Chukotka in the Russian Far East. U.S. National Park Service. Anchorage
5. Anderson D (2000) The Evenkis of central Siberia. In: Freeman, M. (ed) Endangered peoples of the Arctic: Struggles to survive and thrive. Greenwood, Westport
6. Berman M (1985) Renewable resources. In: Morehouse, T (ed) Alaska resources development: Issues of the 1980s 105-134 Westview, Boulder
7. Duhaime G (2005) Economic systems. Arctic Human Development Report
8. Easterly W, Levine R (2002) Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development. NBER Working Paper #9406
9. Fox S (2005) Land claims and self-government. In: Nuttall, M. (ed) Encyclopedia of the Arctic. 1152-1156. Routledge, New York
10. Hickel W (2002) Crisis in the commons: The Alaska solution. Institute for Contemporary Studies, Oakland
11. Huskey L, Morehouse T (1992) Development in remote regions: What do we know? Arctic 45:128-137
12. Huskey L (2002) The changing economies of indigenous communities. Contemporary Issues in the Circumpolar World. University of the Arctic
13. Leven C (1986) A note on the economics of remoteness. In: Bylund E, Wiberg U (ed) Regional dynamics of socio-economic change: The experiences and prospects in sparsely populated areas. 80-86 CERUM, Umea
14. Miller J (1996) What is western about western regional science? Ann Reg Sci 30:343-350
15. National Research Council Committee to Review the CDQ Program (1999) The community development quota program in Alaska. National Academy, Washington
16. North D (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5:97-112
17. Olson M (1996) Big bills left on the sidewalk: Why some nations are rich and others poor. J Econ Perspect 10:3-24
18. Pika A (1999) Neo-traditionalism in the Russian North. Seattle: Canadian Circumpolar Institute and University of Washington
19. Sachs J (2003) Institutions matter but not for everything. Finance and Development. June: 38-41
20. Sachs J (2000) Tropical underdevelopment. Center for International Development Working Paper no. 57. Harvard
21. Wenzel G (2004) Polar Bear as a resource: An overview. Position paper for the 3rd NRF Open Meeting. Yellowknife