Intellectual role taking: Supporting discussion in heterogeneous elementary science classes

Theory into Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 47-54

  Herrenkohl, Leslie Rupert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645167720     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4501_7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous datu in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implication for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
2. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist. emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
3. Cohen, E. (1984). Talking and working together: Status, interaction and learning. In P. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 171-187). New York: Academic.
4. Cohen, E. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Cornelius, L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 467-498.
6. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 433-475.
8. Herrenkohl, L. R., Palincsar, A. S., DeWater, L. S., & Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 451-493.
9. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Wertsch, J. V. (1999). The use of cultural tools: Mastery and appropriation. In I. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and applications (pp. 415-435). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Kawasaki, K., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Yeary, S. (2004). Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit: A case study of third and fourth grade students' developing epistemologies of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1-26.
11. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
12. Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 155-178.
13. Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77, 319-337.
14. Lotman, Y. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26, 32-51.
15. Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas. Boston: Beacon Press.
16. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
17. Rutherford, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.