Calculation of extra copper losses with imposed current magnetodynamic formulations

IEEE Transactions on Magnetics

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 767-770

  Henneron, Thomas ^a   Clénet, Stéphane ^a   Piriou, Francis ^b  

^a UNIV LILLE   (France)

^b University of Lille   (France)

Author keywords

Copper losses; Finite element method (FEM); Magnetodynamics; Potential formulations

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETISM; ELECTROMAGNETS; MAGNETOSTATICS;

ELECTROMAGNET DEVICES; MOVEMENT; NATURAL-ELEMENT METHOD (NEM);

ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT;

EID: 33645155766     PISSN: 00189464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2006.871584     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. A. Bossavit, "a rationale for "edge-elements" in 3-D fields computations," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 74-791, Jan. 1988.
2. P. Dular, P. Kuo-Peng, C. Geuzaine, N. Sadowski, and J. P. A. Bastos, "Dual magnetodynamic formulations and their source fields associated with massive and stranded inductors," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1293-1299, Jul. 2000.
3. T. Henneron, S. Clénet, and F. Piriou, "Comparison of 3D magnetodynamic formulations in term of potential with imposed electric global quantities," COMPEL, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 885-893, 2004.
4. A. Bossavit, "How weak is the "weak solution" in finite element methods?," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 2429-2432, Sep. 1998.
5. Y. Kawase, M. Takuya, and O. Tomohiro, "Magnetic field analysis of coupling transformers for electric vehicle using 3-D finite element method," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 3186-3189, Sep. 1998.
6. 0 - φ formulation for solid conductors," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1729-1732, May 2003.
7. Y. Le Menach, S. Clénet, and F. Piriou, "Numerical model to discretize source fields in the 3D finite element method," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 676-679, Jul. 2000.