Soil water balance scenario studies using predicted soil hydraulic parameters

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1075-1094

  Nemes, A ^a,b,c   Wosten J H M ^b   Bouma, J ^b   Varallyay G ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydraulic conductivity; Pedotransfer function; Scenario; Simulation modelling; Soil water retention

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; SOILS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; SIMULATION MODELLING; SOIL WATER RETENTION;

LAND USE;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; LAND USE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; SOILS; TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULIC PROPERTY; LAND MANAGEMENT; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTION; SOIL WATER;

EID: 33645140597     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5934     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahuja LR, Naney JW, Nielsen DR. 1984. Scaling to characterize soil water properties and infiltration modeling. Soil Science Society of America Journal 48: 970-973.
2. Bouma J. 1989. Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Advances in Soil Science 9: 177-213.
3. Bouma J, Droogers P, Peters P. 1999. Defining the 'ideal' soil structure in surface soil of a Typic Fluvaquent in the Netherlands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 343-348.
4. Cassel DK, Raczkowski CW, Denton HP. 1995. Tillage effects on corn production and soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59: 1436-1443.
5. Cornelis WM, Ronsyn J, van Meirvenne M, Hartmann R. 2001. Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting the soil moisture retention curve. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65(3): 638-648.
6. Czinege E. 2000. A termöhelyspecifikus mütrágyázási szaktanácsadás talajtani alapjainak bövitése (Extension of soil information and knowledge of site-specific nutrient management consulting). PhD thesis, University of Gödöllö Hungary.
7. Droogers P, Bouma J. 1997. Soil survey input in exploratory modeling of sustainable soil management practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61: 1704-1710.
8. Farkas Cs. 2002. A talajnedvesség-forgalom modellezése a talajfizikai tulajdonságok területi inhomogenitásának és szezonális dinamikájának tükrében. PhD thesis, Eötvös Lóránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
9. Farkas Cs, Rajkai K. 2002. Moisture regime with respect to spatial variability of soil hydrophysical properties. Agrokémia és Talajtan 51(1-2): 7-16.
10. Farkas Cs, Gyuricza Cs, László P, Birkás M. 2000. Study of the influence of soil tillage on soil water regime. In Subsoil Compaction, Horn R, van den Akker JJH, Arvidsson J (eds). Advances in Geoecology 32. Catena Verlag: 251-257.
11. Fausey FR, Lal R. 1992. Drainage-tillage effects on a Crosby-Kokomo Soil Association in Ohio III. Organic matter content and chemical properties. Soil Technology 5(1): 1-12.
12. FOCUS. 2000. Focus groundwater scenarios in the EU pesticide registration process. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Working Group, EC document.
13. Hack-ten Broeke MJD, Hegmans JHBM. 1996. Use of soil physical characteristics from laboratory measurements or standard series for modelling unsaturated water flow. Agricultural Water Management 29: 201-213.
14. Hill RL. 1990. Long-term conventional and no tillage effects on selected soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54: 161-166.
15. Imam B, Sorooshian S, Mayr T, Schaap MG, Wösten JHM, Scholes RJ. 1999. Comparison of pedotransfer functions to compute water holding capacity using the van Genuchten model in inorganic soils. Report to IGBP-DIS Soil Data Tasks, IGBP-DIS Working Paper #22, IGBP-DIS, Toulouse Cédex, France.
16. Katsvairo T, Cox WJ, van Es H. 2002. Tillage and rotation effects on soil physical characteristics. Agronomy Journal 94: 299-304.
17. Kay BD, VandenBygaart AJ. 2002. Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil and Tillage Research 66(2): 107-118.
18. Kern JS. 1995. Evaluation of soil water retention models based on basic soil physical properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 59: 1134-1141.
19. Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR. 1994. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58: 517-522.
20. Logsdon SD, Kaspar TC, Cambardella CA. 1999. Depth-incremental soil properties under no-till or chisel management. Soil Science Society of America Journal 63: 197-200.
21. Minasny B, McBratney AB. 2002. The Neuro-m method for fitting neural network parametric pedotransfer functions. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 352-361.
22. Mualem Y. 1976. A new model predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resources Research 12: 513-522.
23. Nemes A. 2002. Unsaturated soil hydraulic database of Hungary: HUNSODA. Agrokémia és Talajtan 51(1-2): 17-26.
24. Nemes A. 2005. Pedotransfer function to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity for Hungarian soils. Agrokémia és Talajtan submitted for publication (in Hungarian).
25. Nemes A, Schaap MG, Leij FJ. 2001. Description of the unsaturated soil hydraulic database UNSODA version 2.0. Journal of Hydrology 251(3-4): 151-162 (database source: http://www.ussl.ars.usda.gov/MODELS/ unsoda.htm).
26. Nemes A, Schaap MG, Wösten JHM. 2003. Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67: 1093-1102.
27. Nemes A, Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YaA. 2005. Influence of organic matter on the estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 1330-1337.
28. Pachepsky YaA, Rawls WJ. (eds.) 2005. Development of pedotransfer functions in Soil Hydrology. Developments in Soil Science 30. Elsevier: Amsterdam.
29. Pachepsky YaA, Rawls WJ, Timlin DJ. 1999. The current status of pedotransfer functions: their accuracy, reliability and utility in field- and regional-scale modelling. In Assessment of Non-point Source Pollution in the Vadose Zone, Corwin DL, Loague K, Ellsworth TR (eds). Geophysical Monograph 108. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 223-234.
30. Pachepsky YaA, Rawls WJ, Gimenez D. 2001. Comparison of soil water retention at field and laboratory scales. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 460-462.
31. Schaap MG, Leij FJ. 1998. Database-related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions. Soil Science 163(10): 765-779.
32. Schaap MG, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MTh. 2001. ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology 251(3-4): 163-176.
33. Semenov MA, Barrow EM. 1997. Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Climatic Change 35: 397-414.
34. Soet M, Stricker JNM. 2003. Functional behaviour of pedotransfer functions in soil water flow simulation. Hydrological Processes 17: 1659-1670.
35. Stefanovits P. 1963. Magyarorsz ́ag Talajai (Soils of Hungary). Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest.
36. Tietje O, Hennings V. 1996. Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedo-transfer functions compared to the variability within FAO textural classes. Geoderma 69: 71-84.
37. van Alphen BJ, Booltink HWG, Bouma J. 2001. Combining pedotransfer functions with physical measurements to improve the estimation of soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma 103: 133-147.
38. van Dam JC, Huygen J, Wesseling JG, Feddes RA, Kabat P, van Walsum PEV, Groenendijk P, van Diepen CA. 1997. SWAP version 2.0, theory. Simulation of water flow, solute transport and plant growth in the soil-water-atmosphere-plant environment. Technical Document 45, DLO Winand Staring Centre, Report 71, Department Water Resources, Agricultural University, Wageningen.
39. van Genuchten MTh. 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44: 892-898.
40. Várallyay G. 1989. Mapping of hydrophysical properties and moisture regime of soils. Agrokémia és Talajtan 38(3-4): 800-817.
41. Várallyay G, Szücs L, Murányi A, Rajkai K, Zilahy P. 1980. Map of soil factors determining the agro-ecological potential of Hungary (1:100 000) II. Agrokémia és Talajtan 29(1-2): 35-76 (in Hungarian).
42. Vereecken H, Maes J, Feyen J. 1990. Estimating unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from easily measured soil properties. Soil Science 149: 1-12.
43. Wagner B, Tarnawski VR, Hennings V, Müller U, Wessolek G, Plagge R. 2001. Evaluation of pedo-transfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma 102: 275-297.
44. Wösten JHM, Veerman GJ, Stolte J. 1994. Water retention and hydraulic conductivity characteristics of top- and sub-soils in the Netherlands: the Staring series. Updated version 1994. Technical Document 18, DLO Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
45. Wösten JHM, Finke PA, Jansen MJW. 1995. Comparison of class and continuous pedotransfer functions to generate soil hydraulic characteristics. Geoderma 66: 227-237.
46. Wösten JHM, Lilly A, Nemes A, Le Bas C. 1999. Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 90: 169-185.
47. Wösten JHM, Pachepsky YaA, Rawls WJ. 2001. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 251(3-4): 123-150.
48. Zibilske LM, Bradford JM, Smart JR. 2002. Conservation tillage induced changes in organic carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus in a semi-arid alkaline subtropical soil. Soil and Tillage Research 66(2): 153-163.