The use of an Internet-based Ask the Doctor service involving family physicians: Evaluation by a web survey

Family Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-166

  Umefjord, Göran ^a,d   Hamberg, Katarina ^a   Malker, Hans ^b   Petersson, Göran ^c  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Vasternorrland County Council   (Sweden)

^c LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Nyland Health Centre   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Access to information; Gender; Information services; Internet; Remote consultation

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CHILD; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RESPONSIBILITY;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SWEDEN;

EID: 33645132282     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmi117     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Powell JA, Darvell M, Gray JA. The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: How the internet is changing healthcare. J R Soc Med 2003; 96: 74-76.
2. White CB, Moyer CA, Stern DT, Katz SJ. A Content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: Patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 260-267.
3. Neville RG, Marsden W, McCowan C, Pagliari C, Mullen H, Fannin A. Email consultations in general practice. Inform Prim Care 2004; 12: 207-214.
4. Sittig DF. Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2003; 3: 11.
5. Horrigan J, Rainie L. Counting on the Internet: Pew Internet & American Life Project 2002. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/reports/ toc.asp?Report=80.
6. New American Academy of Dermatology Survey Finds Patients Do Their Homework: American Academy of Dermatology, 2002. Available at: www.aad.org/public/News/NewsReleases/Press+Release+Archives/Other/ Homework.htm.
7. Liederman EM, Morefield CS. Web messaging: A new tool for patient-physician communication. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10: 260-270.
8. Labiris G, Coertzen I, Katsikas A, Karydis A, Petounis A. An eight-year study of internet-based remote medical counselling. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8: 222-225.
9. Ask the Doctor & Second Opinion Services: The Karolinska Institutet Library, Sweden. Available at: www.mic.ki.se/Diseases/askdoc.html.
10. Web-based second opinion service expanding quickly. Data Strateg Benchmarks 2001; 5: 161, 172-174.
11. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: Motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 151-156.
12. Umefjord G, Petersson G, Hamberg K. Reasons for consulting a doctor on the Internet: Web survey of users of an Ask the Doctor service. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5: E26.
13. eRisk Working Group for Healthcare: Guidelines for Online Communication: The Medem Network, 2002. Available at: www.medem.com/phy/ phy_eriskguidelines.cfm.
14. Car J, Sheikh A. Email consultations in health care: 2-acceptability and safe application. BMJ 2004; 329: 439-442.
15. Collste G. The internet doctor and medical ethics. Ethical implications of the introduction of the Internet into medical encounters. Med Health Care Philos 2002; 5: 121-125.
16. Miller TE, Derse AR. Between strangers: The practice of medicine online. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002; 21: 168-179.
17. Schafernak KT. World Wide Web medical consultations a global problem. N Z Med J 2001; 114: 146.
18. A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet: US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, 2002. Available at: http://www.esa.doc.gov/reports/anationonline2.pdf.
19. Horrigan J, Rainie L, Allen K, Boyce A, Madden M, O'Grady E. The ever shifting Internet population: Pew Internet & American Life Project 2003. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/88/report_display.asp.
20. The Swedes and The Internet 2002: World Internet Institute; 2002 (in Swedish).
21. Birru MS, Monaco VM, Charles L et al. Internet usage by low-literacy adults seeking health information: An observational analysis. J Med Internet Res 2004; 6: E25.
22. Eysenbach G, Wyatt J. Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4: E13.
23. Braithwaite D, Emery J, De LS, Sutton S. Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: A valid alternative? Fam Pract 2003; 20: 545-551.
24. Vehovar V, Lozar K, Batagelj Z, Zaletel M. Nonresponse in web surveys. In Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little JA (eds). Survey Nonresponse. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2001. pp. 229-242.
25. Lorber J. Gender and the Social Construction of Illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1997.
26. Wyke S, Hunt K, Ford G. Gender differences in consulting a general practitioner for common symptoms of minor illness. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 901-906.
27. Hallström O, Lindén P. [II-stiftelsens internetundersökning, rapport 1], in Swedish 2005.
28. Delichatsios H, Callahan M, Charlson M. Outcomes of telephone medical care. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13: 579-585.
29. O'Cathain A, Munro JF, Nicholl JP, Knowles E. How helpful is NHS direct? Postal survey of callers BMJ 2000; 320: 1035.
30. Fox S, Fallows D. Internet health resources: Health searches and email have become commonplace, but there is room for improvement in searches and overall Internet access: Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2003. Available at: www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=95.
31. Theobald K. The experience of spouses whose partners have suffered a myocardial infarction: A phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 595-601.
32. Rees CE, Bath PA. Exploring the information flow: Partners of women with breast cancer, patients, and healthcare professionals. Oncol Nurs Forum 2000; 27: 1267-1275.
33. Echlin KN Rees CE. Information needs and information-seeking behaviors of men with prostate cancer and their partners: A review of the literature. Cancer Nurs 2002; 25: 35-41.
34. Bunn F, Byrne G, Kendall S. Telephone consultation and triage: Effects on health care use and patient satisfaction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004; (4): CD004180.
35. Niemann S, Meer A, Simonin C, Abel T. Medical telephone triage and patient behaviour: How do they compare? Swiss Med Wkly 2004; 134: 126-131.
36. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 903-918.
37. Blanchard J, Lurie N. R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Patient reports of disrespect in the health care setting and its impact on care. J Fam Pract 2004; 53: 721.
38. Johansson EE, Hamberg K, Lindgren G, Westman G. "I've been crying my way" - qualitative analysis of a group of female patients' consultation experiences. Fam Pract 1996; 13: 498-503.
39. Perneger TV, Etter JF, Raetzo MA, Schaller P, Stalder H. Comparison of patient satisfaction with ambulatory visits in competing health care delivery settings in Geneva, Switzerland. J Epidemiol Community Health 1996; 50: 463-468.
40. McGinnis EB. Patients' rights. BMJ 1995; 311: 671.
41. Rippere V. Are second opinions a right or a concession? BMJ 1995; 311: 1506.
42. Mustafa M, Bijl M, Gans R. What is the value of patient-sought second opinions? Eur J Intern Med 2002; 13: 445.
43. Johnson A, Sandford J, Tyndall J. Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2003; (4): CD003716.
44. Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: A review. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 480-492.
45. McWhinney IR. Textbook of Family Medicine. (2nd edn). Ontario: Oxford University Press; 1997.
46. Ferguson T. From doc-providers to coach-consultants: Type 1 Vs. Type 2 provider-patient relationships, 2001. Available at: www.fergusonreport.com/articles/tfr07-01.htm.