Robust curvelet-domain data continuation with sparseness constraints

67th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, EAGE Conference and Exhibition, incorporating SPE EUROPE2005 - Extended Abstracts

Volumn 67th European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers Conference and Exhibition 2005: The Challenge of Discovery. Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 117-120

  Herrmann, Felix J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERPOLATION; SEISMOLOGY; WAVE EQUATIONS;

CAUSTIC-FREE DATA; DATA INTERPOLATION; SEISMIC DATA;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 33645122500     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. E. J. Candès and L. Demanet. The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse. 2004. Preprint: http://www.acm.caltech.edu/demanet.
2. E. J. Candès and F. Guo. New multiscale transforms, minimum total variation synthesis: Applications to edge-preserving image reconstruction. Signal Processing, pages 1519-1543, 2002.
3. J. Claerbout. Earth soundings analysis: Processing versus inversion. Blackwell Scientific publishing, 1992.
4. I. Daubechies, M. Defrise, and C. de Mol. An iterative thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems with a sparsity constrains. CPAM, pages 1413-1457, 2005.
5. A. Duijndam, A. Volker, and P. Zwartjes. Reconstruction as efficient alternative for least-squares migration, pages 10121015. Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 2000.
6. M. Elad, J. Starck, P. Querre, and D. Donoho. Simulataneous Cartoon and Texture Image Inpainting using Morphological Component Analysis (MCA). 2005.
7. F. Herrmann and P. Moghaddam. Sparseness- and continuity-constrained seismic imaging with curvelet frames. 2005.
8. F. J. Herrmann and P. Moghaddam. Curvelet-based non-linear adaptive subtraction with sparseness constraints. In Expanded Abstracts, Tulsa, 2004. Soc. Expl. Geophys.
9. L. Karlovitz. Construction of nearest points in the ℓ1, p even and ℓ1 norms. J. Approx. Theory, 3, 1970.
10. S. G. Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, 1997.
11. M. Sacchi and T. Ulrych. Estimation of the discrete fourier transform, a linear inversion approach. Geophysics, 61(04): 11281136, 1996.
12. M. Schonewille and A. Duijndam. Parabolic radon transform, sampling and efficiency, volume 66, pages 667-678. Soc. of Expl. Geophys., 2001.
13. H. Smith. A Hardy space for fourier integral operators. J. Geom. Anal., 7, 1997.
14. J. L. Starck, M. Elad, and D. Donoho. Redundant multiscale transforms and their application to morphological component separation. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 132, 2004.
15. D. Trad, T. Ulrych, and M. Sacchi. Latest views of the sparse radon transform. Geophysics, 68(1):386-399, 2003.
16. D. O. Trad. Interpolation and multiple attenuation with migration operators. Geophysics, 68(6):2043-2054, 2003.