Truth-conditional pragmatics

Nous

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2002, Pages 105-134

  Bezuidenhout, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645118614     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.5     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
2. Armstrong, D. (1999). Universals as attributes. In J. Kim & E. Sosa (Eds.), Metaphysics: An Anthology (pp. 198-208). Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Austin, J. L. (1979). Truth. In J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock (Eds.), Philosophical Papers (2nd ed., pp. 117-133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bach, K. (1984). Default reasoning: Jumping to conclusions and knowing when to think twice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 37-58.
5. Bach, K. (1994a). Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124-162.
6. Bach, K. (1994b). Semantic slack: What is said and more. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 267-291). London: Routledge.
7. Bach, K. (1995). Standardization vs. conventionalization. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 677-686.
8. Bach, K. (1998). Standardization revisited. In A. Kasher (Ed.), Pragmatics: Critical Assessment. London: Routledge.
9. Bezuidenhout, A. L. (2001). Metaphor and what is said: A defense of a direct expression view of metaphor. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25.
10. Bloom, P. (Ed.). (1993). Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 156-186.
11. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56-311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cappelen, H., & LePore, E. (1997). On an alleged connection between indirect speech and the theory of meaning. Mind & Language, 12, 278-296.
13. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (1998). Reply to Richard and Reimer. Mind & Language, 13(4), 617-621.
14. Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (2001). Radical and moderate pragmatics: Does meaning determine truth conditions? Unpublished manuscript.
15. Carston, R. (1997). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? Linguistische Berichte, 103-127.
16. Carston, R. (1998). Pragmatics and the Explicit-Implicit Distinction. Unpublished Ph.D., University College London, London.
17. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
18. Clark, A. (1997). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Clark, H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430-477.
20. Clark, H. (1992a). Arenas of Language Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Fauconnier, G., & Sweetser, E. (Eds.). (1996). Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Fine, K. (1975). Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese, 30, 265-300.
25. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Lahav, R. (1989). Against compositionality: The case of adjectives. Philosophical Studies 57, 261-279.
28. Lahav, R. (1993). The combinatorial-connectionist debate and the pragmatics of adjectives. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1(1), 71-88.
29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
31. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Creates Mathematics. New York: Basic Books.
32. Moravcsik, J. M. (1998). Meaning, Creativity, and the Partial Inscrutability of the Human Mind (Vol. 79). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
33. Neale, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Neale, S. (2000). On being explicit: Comments on Stanley and Szabo, and on Bach. Mind & Language, 15, 284-294.
35. Nelson, M. (2001). When is an expression context-sensitive? Unpublished manuscript.
36. Nunez, R., & Freeman, W. J. (Eds.). (1999). Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion. Bowling Green: Imprint Academic.
37. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 264-274.
38. Pustejovsky, J. (1998). The Semantics of Lexical Underspecification. Folia Linguistica, 32(3-4), 323-347.
39. Pustejovsky, J., & Boguraev, B. (Eds.). (1996). Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Recanati, F. (1995). The alleged priority of literal interpretation. Cognitive Science, 19, 207-232.
42. Recanati, F. (2001). Literal/nonliteral. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 25.
43. Recanati, F. (Forthcoming). The limits of expressibility. In B. Smith (Ed.), John Searle.
44. Salmon, N. (2002). The good, the bad, and the ugly. In M. Reimer & A. Bezuidenhout (Eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45. Searle, J. R. (1980). The background of meaning. In J. R. Searle & F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (Eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics (pp. 221-232.): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
46. Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Second ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
48. Stainton, R. (1994). Using non-sentences: An application of Relevance Theory. Pragmatics and Cognition, 2, 269-284.
49. Stainton, R. (1995). Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 281-296.
50. Stanley, J., & Szabo, Z. G. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language, 15(2 & 3), 219-261.
51. Sweetser, E. E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Travis, C. (1996). Meaning's role in truth. Mind, 105, 451-466.
53. Travis, C. (2000). Unshadowed Thought: Representation in Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. van Deemter, K., & Peters, S. (Eds.). (1996). Semantic Ambiguity and Underspecification. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
55. Waismann, F. (1951). Verifiability. In A. Flew (Ed.), Logic and Language (pp. 117-144). Oxford: Blackwell.
56. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London: Routledge.