|
Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 361-364
|
A comparison of preceptor and preceptee's perceptions of how the preceptor's role is operationalized
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR;
ARTICLE;
AUSTRALIA;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COOPERATION;
EDUCATION;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HUMAN;
IN SERVICE TRAINING;
LONGITUDINAL STUDY;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING EDUCATION;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
PUBLIC RELATIONS;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SELF CONCEPT;
SOCIAL SUPPORT;
STANDARD;
TEACHER;
TIME;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CLINICAL COMPETENCE;
COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR;
EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING;
FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL;
HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND;
HUMANS;
INSERVICE TRAINING;
INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS;
LONGITUDINAL STUDIES;
MENTORS;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL;
PRECEPTORSHIP;
PROGRAM EVALUATION;
QUEENSLAND;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SELF CONCEPT;
SELF EFFICACY;
SOCIAL SUPPORT;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 33645111063
PISSN: 09621067
EISSN: 13652702
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01329.x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (4)
|