Comparison of higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after LASIK, verisyse phakic IOL, and array multifocal IOL

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 231-236

  Chandhrasri, Sasivimon ^a   Knorz, Michael C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEVICE; EXCIMER LASER; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANTATION; KERATOMILEUSIS; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; MYOPIA; OPTICS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESBYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTIVE SURGERY; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33645110536     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081-597x-20060301-06     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sarver EJ, Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Image quality in myopic eyes corrected with laser in situ keratomileusis and phakic intraocular Lens. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:397-404.
2. El Danasoury MA, El Maghraby A, Gamali TO. Comparison of iris-fixed Artisan lens implantation with excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in correcting myopia between -9.0 to -19.5 diopters: a randomized study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:955-964.
3. Miller JM, Anwaruddin R, Straub J, Schwiegerling J. Higher order aberrations in normal, dilated, intraocular lens, and LASIK corneas. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S579-S583.
4. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1396-1403.
5. Wang L, Koch DD. Anterior corneal optical aberrations induced by laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1702-1708.
6. Oshika T, Miyata K, Tokunaga T, Samejima T, Amano S, Tanaka S, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Maeda N, Fujikado T. Higher order wavefront aberrations of cornea and magnitude of refractive correction in laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1154-1158.
7. Holladay JT, Lang A, Portney V. Analysis of edge glare phenomena in intraocular edge designs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999;25:748-752.
8. Brunette I, Bueno JM, Harissi-Dagher M, Parent M, Podtetenev M, Hamam H. Optical quality of the eye with the Artisan phakic lens for the correction of high myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:167-174.
9. El Hage S, Berny F. Contribution of the crystalline lens to the spherical aberration of the eye. J Opt Soc Am. 1973;63:205-211.
10. Barbero S, Marcos S, Jimenez-Alfaro I. Optical aberrations of intraocular lenses measured in vivo and in vitro. J Opt Soc Am Opt Image Sci Vis. 2003;20:1841-1851.
11. Montes-Mico R, Charman WN. Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001;17:646-651.
12. Montes-Mico R, Espana E, Menezo JL. Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:353-356.
13. Montes-Mico R, Alió JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:703-711.
14. Marcos S. Are changes in ocular aberrations with age a significant problem for refractive surgery? J Refract Surg. 2002;18:572-577.
15. Owsley C, Sekuler R, Siemsen D. Contrast sensitivity throughout adulthood. Vision Res. 1983;23:689-699.
16. Applegate RA, Sarver EJ, Khemsara V. Are all aberrations equal? J Refract Surg. 2002;18:556-562.