Product development processes - From deterministic to probabilistic: A design for 6-Sigma approach to lean product validation, Part II

International Journal of Product Development

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 18-36

  Khalaf, Faysal ^a   Yang, Kai ^b  

^a FORD MOTOR COMPANY   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Axiomatic design; Computer Aided Engineering (CAE); Design for 6 Sigma (DFSS); Design of Experiments (DoE); Design validation; Failure Mode Analysis (FMA); Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA); Product development process; Quality Function Deployment (QFD); Risk Priority Number (RPN)

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645109746     PISSN: 14779056     EISSN: 17418178     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJPD.2006.008873     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Clemente, R.C. and Marcio, G.P. (2003) The Evolution of the Product Development Process by the Strategic Contribution of the Information Technology in an Automaker Co., SAE-2003-01-3722.
2. Fang, K.T. and Winker, P. (1998) 'Uniformity and orthogonality', Technical Report, Hong Kong Baptist University, MATH-175.
3. Liu, B. (2003) 'Product development processes and their importance to organizational capabilities', MIT Thesis.
4. Mar, C.W. (1999) 'Process improvement applied to product development: an approach to control development lead time', MIT Thesis.
5. Rinkevich, D.J. and Samson, F.P. (1999/2004) 'An improved powertain attributes development process with the use of design structure matrix', MIT Thesis, February.
6. Smith, L.R., Zlotin, B. and Zusman, A. (1999) 'The dilemma of improving quality in new product development', Altshuller Institute Conference "TRIZCON99", 7-8 March.
7. Ulrich, K.T. and Eppinger, S.D. (2000) Product Design and Development, 2nd edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
8. Yang, K. and El-Haik, B. (2003) Design for Six Sigma A Road map for Product Development, McGraw-Hill.