New, but improved? Comparison between first and revised version of the Helping Alliance questionnaire

Schweizer Archiv fur Neurologie und Psychiatrie

Volumn 157, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 23-28

  Le Bloc'h, Y ^a   De Roten, Yves ^a   Drapeau, M ^b   Despland, J N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

French validation; Outcome; Scale; Therapeutic alliance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33645109102     PISSN: 02587661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4414/sanp.2006.01669     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alexander LB, Luborsky L. The Penn helping alliance scales. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM, editors. The Psyche-therapeutic Process: A Research Handbook. New York: Guilford; 1986. p. 325-66.
2. Bachelor A. Comparison and relationship to outcome of diverse dimensions of the helping alliance as seen by client and therapist. Psychotherapy 1991;28:534-49.
3. Barber JP, Luborsky L, Crits-Christoph P, Thase ME, Weiss R, Frank A, et al. Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome in treatment of cocaine dependence. Psych Res 1999;9:54-73.
4. Bassler M. The Helping Alliance questionnaire of Luborsky: a German replicative study with inpatient psychotherapy. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Santa Barbara, CA; 2002.
5. Bordin E. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice 1979;16:252-60.
6. de Roten Y. Questionnaire de satisfaction du patient [Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire]. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Psychotherapy, University of Lausanne; 1999.
7. de Roten Y, Fisher M, Drapeau M, Beretta V, Kramer U, Favre N, et al. Is one assessment enough? Patterns of early alliance development and outcome. Clin Psychol Psychother 2004;11:324-31.
8. Fenton LR, Cecero JJ, Nich C, Frankfurter TL, Carroll KM. Perspective is everything: the predictive validity of six working alliance instruments. J Psychother Pract Res 2001;10:262-8.
9. Gérin P, Dazord A, Sali AM. Psychothérapies et changements. Méthodologie de leur évaluation. Paris: PUF; 1991.
10. Gilliéron E. Manuel de psychothérapies brèves. Paris: Dunod; 1997.
11. Hartley DE, Strupp HH. The therapeutic alliance: its relationship to outcome in brief psychotherapy. In: Masling J, editor. Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytical Theories. Hillsdale: Analytic Press; 1983. p. 1-37.
12. Hatcher RL, Barends AW. Patients' view of the alliance in psychotherapy: exploring factor analysis in three alliance measures. J Consult Clin Psychol 1996;64:1326-36.
13. Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. The development of the working alliance inventory. In: Greenberg LS, Pinsof WM, editors. The Working Alliance: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Wiley; 1986. p. 109-28.
14. Horvath OH, Symonds DB. Relationship between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology 1991;38:139-49.
15. Luborsky L. A pattern-setting therapeutic alliance study revisited. Psych Res 2000;10:17-29.
16. Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, Johnson S, Najavits LM, Frank A, et al. The revised Helping Alliance questionnaire (HAq-II): psychometric properties. Journal of Psychotherapy, Practice and Research 1996;5:260-71.
17. Marmar C, Weiss DS, Gaston L. Toward the validation of the California Therapeutic Alliance Rating System. Psych Ass 1989;1:46-52.
18. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:438-50.
19. Tadic M, Drapeau M, de Roten Y, Solai S, Despland JN. Development of a competence scale for brief psychodynamic investigation. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr 2003;154:28-36.
20. Tichenor W, Hill CE. A comparison of six measures of working alliance. Psychotherapy 1989;26:195-9.