A two-stage analysis of repeated measurements with dropouts and/or intermittent missing data

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 285-291

  Overall, John E ^a,c   Tonidandel, Scott ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b DAVIDSON COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Dropouts; Equal slopes; Missing data; Power; Repeated measures; Sample size; Summary statistics

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MEASUREMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS; DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 33645104844     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20217     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Ahn, C., Tonidandel, S., & Overall, J.E. (2000). Issues in use of SAS PROC.MIXED to test the significance of treatment effects in controlled clinical trials. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 10, 265-286.
2. Davidian, M., & Giltinan, D.M. (1995). Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. Frison, L.J., & Pocock, S.J. (1997). Linearly divergent treatment effects in clinical trials with repeated measures: Efficient analysis using summary statistics. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 2855-2872.
4. Kraemer, H.C., & Thiemann, S. (1989). A strategy to use soft data effectively in randomized controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 148-154.
5. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
6. Overall, J.E. (1997). Drop-outs and a random regression model. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 7, 383-402.
7. Overall, J.E., Ahn, C., Shivakumar, C., & Kalburgi, Y. (1999). Problematic formulations of SAS PROC.MIXED models for repeated measurements. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 9, 189-216.
8. Overall, J.E., & Shivakumar, C. (1999). Testing differences in response trends across a normalized time domain. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1-11.
9. Overall, J.E., Shobaki, G., Shivakumar, C., & Steele, J. (1998). Adjusting sample sizes for anticipated dropouts in clinical trials. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 34, 25-33.
10. Overall, J.E., & Tonidandel, S. (2002). Measuring change in controlled longitudinal studies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 109-124.
11. Overall, J.E., & Tonidandel, S. (2004). Robustness of generalized estimating equation (GEE) tests of significance against misspecification of the error structure model. Biometrical Journal, 46, 203-213.
12. Palta, M., & Cook, T. (1987). Some considerations in the analysis of rates of change in longitudinal studies. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 599-611.
13. Talwalker, S. (1996). Analysis of repeated measurements with dropouts among Alzheimer patients using summary measures and meta-analysis. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 6, 49-58.
14. Weinberg, J.M., & Lagakos, S.W. (2001). Efficiency comparisons of rank and permutation tests based on summary statistics computed from repeated measures data. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 705-731.