Forest Plans and ad hoc scientist groups in the 1990s: Coping with the Forest Service viability clause

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 32-41

  Duncan, Sally L ^a   Thompson, Jonathan R ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ad hoc science groups; Forest Plans; Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Plan; National Forest Management Act; Northwest Forest Plan; Species viability

Indexed keywords

AD HOC SCIENCE GROUPS; FOREST PLANS; INTERIOR COLUMBIA BASIN ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN; NATIONAL FOREST MANAGEMENT ACT; NORTHWEST FOREST PLAN; SPECIES VIABILITY;

ECOSYSTEMS; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; FORESTS;

EID: 33645102966     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2005.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bella D. Ethics and the credibility of applied science. In: Reeves G. (Ed). Ethical Issues in Natural Resource Management (2001), USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR
2. Bosso C.J. Environmental groups and the new political landscape. In: Vig N.J., and Kraft M.E. (Eds). Environmental Policy (2000), Congressional Quarterly Press, Washington, DC 55-76
3. Dunlap R.E., and Van Liere K.D. The 'new environmental paradigm': a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9 (1978) 10-19
4. Everest F.H., Swanston D.N., Shaw C.G., Smith W.P., Julin K.R., and Allen S.D. Evaluation of the Use of Scientific Information in Developing the 1997 Forest Plan for the Tongass National Forest (1997), USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR GTR-415
5. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team (FEMAT) 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management: An ecological, economic and social assessment. Portland, OR.: USDA Forest Service; US Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Environmental Protection Agency. 1033 pp.
6. Gunderson L.H. Stepping back: assessing for understanding in complex regional systems. In: Johnson K.N., Swanson F., Herring M., and Greene S. (Eds). Bioregional Assessments: Science at the Crossroads of Management and Policy (1999), Island Press 27-42
7. Hirt P. Conspiracy of Optimism: Management of the National Forest Since World War Two (1994), University of Nebraska Press 416 pp.
8. Hirt P. Institutional failure in the U.S. forest service: a historical perspective. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 7 (1999) 217-239
9. Johnson K.N. Consideration of watershed in long term forest planning models: the case of FORPLAN and its use on the National Forests. In: Naiman R.J. (Ed). Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change (1992), Springer-Verlag, New York 347-360
10. Johnson K.N. Bulls in the China Shop: Science Assessments of Federal Forests of the Pacific Northwest in the 1990s (2000), High Desert Museum, Bend, OR Prepared for the
11. Johnson, K.N., Franklin, J.F., Thomas, J.W., Gordon, J., 1991. Alternatives for management of late successional forests of the Pacific Norwest. A report to the Agricultural Committee and the Merchant Marine and Fisheries Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives by The Scientific Panel of Late-Successional Ecosystems.
12. Kuhn F. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
13. Milstein M. Columbia basin plan goes to pieces. The Oregonian (2003) (02/23/2003)
14. Quigley, T.M., Haynes, R.W., Graham, R.T., (Tech. Eds.), 1996. Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management PNW-GTR-382.
15. Rayner, S., Lach, D., Ingram, H., Houck, M., 2002. Weather Forecasts are for Wimps. Final Report to NOAA Office of Global Programs.
16. Ruggiero L.F., Hayword G.D., and Squires J.R. Viability analysis in biological evaluations: concepts of population viability analysis, biological population, and ecological scale. Conservation Biology 8 2 (1994) 264-372
17. Steel B., et al. Environmental Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach (2003), McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
18. Thomas J.W. Dynamic vs. static management in a fire influenced landscape-the Northwest Forest Plan. Presented at the: "Fire in Oregon's Forest" Conference Bend OR Oct. 23 2002. Oregon Forest Resources Institute (2002)
19. Thomas, J.W., Forsman, E.D., Lint, J.B., Meslow, E.C., Noon, B.R., Verner, J., 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl: report of the inter agency Scientific Committee to the address the conservation of the of the northern spotted owl. USDA Forest Service and National Park Service, Portland Oregon. United States Printing Office 1990-791-171/20026, Washington D.C., U.S.A.
20. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Land and Resource Management Plan (1990), Deschutes National Forest, Bend, OR
21. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Land and Resource Management Plan Malheur National Forest (1990), John Day, Oregon
22. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Land and Resource Management Plan (1990), Siuslaw National Forest, Corvallis, OR
23. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Land and Resource Management Plan (1990), Siuslaw National Forest, Corvallis, OR
24. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Land and Resource Management Plan (1990), Umpqua National Forest, Roseburg, OR
25. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region. Land and Resource Management Plan (1990), Willamette National Forest, Eugene, OR
26. Walker D.H., Cowell S.G., and Johnson A.K.L. Integrating research results into decision making about natural resource management at a catchment scale. Agricultural Systems 69 (2001) 85-98