How important are psychosocial predictors of mammography receipt among older women when immediate access is provided via on-site service?

American Journal of Health Promotion

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 237-246

  Glenn, Beth ^a   Bastani, Roshan ^a   Reuben, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer Screening; Prevention Research

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; SCREENING TEST; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TELEPHONE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645090176     PISSN: 08901171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.4.237     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. American Cancer Society. ACS Cancer Detection Guidelines. January 2004. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/ content/ PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_ Guidelines_36.asp?sitearea=PED. Accessed December 8, 2004.
2. American Medical Association. AMA Policies on Breast Cancer. H-525.993 Mammography Screening in Asymptomatic Women Forty Years and Older. Available at: http://www. ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/9060.html. Accessed December 8, 2004.
3. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale. February 2002. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ 3rduspstf/breastcancer/brcanrr.htm. Accessed on December 8, 2004.
4. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C. Cross-sectional versus prospective predictors of screening Mammography. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996;5:845-848.
5. Dawson DA, Thompson GB. Breast cancer risk factors and screening: United States, 1987. Hyattsville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1990. DHHS Publication PHS 90-1500.
6. Fox SA, Roetzheim R, Velt CT. Barriers to breast cancer screening and strategies to overcome them. In: Jatoi I, ed. Breast Cancer Screening. Austin, Tex: Landes Bioscience; 1997:135-153.
7. Hawley ST, Earp JA, O'Malley M, et al. The role of physician recommendation in women's mammography use: is it a 2-stage process? Med Care. 2000;38:392-403.
8. Paskett ED, McMahon K, Tautm C, et al. Clinic-based interventions to promote breast and cervical cancer screening. Prev Med. 1998;27:120-128.
9. Costanza M, Stoddard A, Luckmann R, et al. Promoting mammography-results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:39-46.
10. King ES, Rimer BK, Seay J, et al. Promoting mammography use through progressive interventions: is it effective? Am J Public Health. 1994;84:43-49.
11. Rimer BK. Mammography use in the US: trends and the impact of interventions. Ann Behav Med. 1994;16:317-326.
12. Snell JL, Buck EL. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 1996;25:702-707.
13. Wagner TH. The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14:64-70.
14. Davis NA, Lewis MJ, Rimer BK, et al. Evaluation of a phone intervention to promote mammography in a managed care plan. Am J Health Promot. 1997;11:247-249.
15. Rimer BK, Resch N, King E, et al. Multistrategy health education programs to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older. Public Health Rep. 1992;107:369-380.
16. Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, Harding GH. Financial incentive and the use of mammography among Hispanic migrants to the United States. Health Care Women Int. 1996;17:281-291.
17. Kiefe CL, McKayk SV, Halevy A, Brody BA. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1217-1224.
18. Stoner TJ, Dowd B, Carr WP, et al. Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial. Health Serv Res. 1998;33:11-28.
19. Reuben DB, Bassett LW, Hirsch SH, et al. A randomized clinical trial to assess the benefit of offering on-site mobile mammography in addition to health education for older women. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1509-1514.
20. Bastani R, Marcus A, Maxwell A, et al. Prospective evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles. Prev Med. 1994;23:83-90.
21. Bastani R, Maxwell AE, Bradford C, et al. Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer. Prev Med. 1999;29:355-364.
22. Becker M, Maiman L. The health belief model: origins and correlates in psychological theory. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:336-353.
23. Ajzen I, Madden T. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Soc Psych. 1986;22:453-474.
24. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
25. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51:390-395.
26. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: application to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992;47:1102-1114.
27. Green L, Kreuter M, Deeds S, et al. Health Education Planning: A Diagnostic Approach. Palo Alto, Calif: Mayfield Publishing Co; 1980.
28. Greer AL. The state of the art versus the state of the science: the diffusion of new medical technologies into practice. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1988;4:5-26.
29. Lomas J, Haynes RB. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from "official" to "individual" clinical policy. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(suppl):77-97.
30. Mittman BS, Tonesk X, Jacobson PD. Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:413-422.
31. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191-215.
32. Rosenstock I, Strecher, Victor J, et al. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:175-183.
33. Farquhar JW. The American Way of Life Need Not Be Hazardous to Your Health. New York, NY: WW Norton; 1978.
34. Venters MH. Family life and cardiovascular risk. Implications for the prevention of chronic disease. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22:1067.
35. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Consortium Summary. Mammography: a missed clinical opportunity. JAMA. 1990;264:54-58.
36. Norman SA, Localio AR, Zhou L, et al. Validation of self-reported screening mammography histories among women with and without breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158:264-271.
37. Caplan LS, McQueen DV, Qualters JR, et al. Validity of women's self-reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(11 part 1):1182-1187.
38. Skinner CS, Sykes RK, Monsees BS, et al. Learn, share, and live: breast cancer education for older, urban minority women. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25:60-78.
39. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer risk assessment tool. Available at: http://bcra.nci. nih.gov/brc/. Accessed December 7, 2004.
40. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York, NY: Wiley; 1989.
41. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51:1173-1182.
42. Glasgow RE, Whitlock EP, Valanis BG, et al. Barriers to mammography and Pap smear screening among women who recently had neither, one or both types of screening. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22:223-228.
43. Rimer, BK, Meissner, H, Breen, N, et al. Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In: Schneiderman N, Speers MA, Silva J, Tomes H, Gentry JH, eds. Integrating Behavioral and Social Sciences with Public Health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2001.
44. Legler J, Breen N, Meissner H, et al. Predicting patterns of mammography use: a geographic perspective on national needs for intervention research. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:929-947.
45. Suter LG, Nakano CY, Elmore JG. The personal costs and convenience of screening mammography. J Womens Health Gender-Based Med. 2002;11:667-672.
46. Gold M, Seigel J, Russel L, Weinstein M. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. The Role of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
47. McNoe B, Richardson A, Elwood J, Factors affecting participation in mammography screening. NZ Med J. 1996;109:359.
48. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:915-916. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ uspstf/uspsprca.htm. Accessed December 8, 2004.
49. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, et al. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1704-1713.
50. O'Malley AS, Lawrence W, Liang W, et al. Feasibility of mobile cancer screening and prevention. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002;13:298-319.
51. Clarke PM. Cost-benefit analysis and mammographic screening: a travel cost approach. J Health Econ. 1998;17:767-787.