Exposure of mouse preosteoblasts to pulsed electromagnetic fields reduces the amount of mature, type I collagen in the extracellular matrix

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 242-253

  Sakai, Yoshitada ^a,c   Patterson, Thomas E ^a   Ibiwoye, Michael O ^a   Midura, Ronald J ^a   Zborowski, Maciej ^a   Grabiner, Mark D ^a,b   Wolfman, Alan ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c KOBE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collagen; Extracellular matrix; Osteoblast; PEMF; Pulsed electromagnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; MESSENGER RNA; SCLEROPROTEIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; COLLAGEN DEGRADATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HYPOTHESIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEADY STATE; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; COLLAGEN TYPE I; CULTURE MEDIA, CONDITIONED; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; MICE; OSTEOBLASTS;

EID: 33645080703     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20012     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Pienkowski D, Pollack SR. 1983. The origin of stress-generated potentials in fluid-saturated bone. J Orthop Res 1:30-41.
2. Aaron RK, Coimbor DM. 1992. Electrical stimulation of bone induction and grafting. In: Habal MB, Redd AH, editors. Bone grafts & bone substitutes. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; p 192-205.
3. Bassett CA. 1987. Electrical stimulation of repair of bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:1110-1111.
4. Korenstein R, Somjen D, Fischler H, et al. 1984. Capacitative pulsed electric stimulation of bone cells. Induction of cyclic-AMP changes and DNA synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 803:302-307.
5. McLeod KJ, Rubin CT, Donahue HJ. 1995. Electromagnetic fields in bone repair and adaptation. Radio Sci 30:233-244.
6. De Mattei M, Caruso A, Traina GC, et al. 1999. Correlation between pulsed electromagnetic fields exposure time and cell proliferation increase in human osteosarcoma cell lines and human normal osteoblast cells in vitro. Bioelectromagnetics 20: 177-182.
7. Diniz P, Shomura K, Soejima K, et al. 2002. Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation on bone tissue like formation are dependent on the maturation stages of the osteoblasts. Bioelectromagnetics 23:398-405.
8. Chiabrera A, Bianco B, Moggia E, et al. 2000. Zeeman-Stark modeling of the RF EMF interaction with ligand binding. Bioelectromagnetics 21:312-324.
9. Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis AK, Margaritis LH. 2002. Mechanism for action of electromagnetic fields on cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 298: 95-102.
10. Ibiwoye MO, Powell KA, Grabiner MD, et al. 2004. Bone mass is preserved in a critical-sized osteotomy by low energy pulsed electromagnetic fields as quantitated by in vivo micro-computed tomography. J Orthop Res 22:1086-1093.
11. Midura RJ, Ibiwoye MO, Powell KA, et al. 2005. Pulsed electromagnetic field treatments enhance the healing of fibular osteotomies. J Orthop Res 23:1035-1046.
12. Goodman R, Shirley-Henderson A. 1991. Transcription and translation in cells exposed to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 25:335-355.
13. Fitzsimmons RJ, Farley JR, Adey WR, et al. 1989. Frequency dependence of increased cell proliferation, in vitro, in exposures to a low-amplitude, low-frequency electric field: evidence for dependence on increased mitogen activity released into culture medium. J Cell Physiol 139:586-591.
14. McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. 1992. The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 74:920-929.
15. Lohmann CH, Schwartz Z, Liu Y, et al. 2000. Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of MG63 osteoblast-like cells affects differentiation and local factor production. J Orthop Res 18:637-646.
16. Lohmann CH, Schwartz Z, Liu Y, et al. 2003. Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect phenotype and connexin 43 protein expression in MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cells and ROS 17/2.8 osteoblast-like cells. J Orthop Res 21:326-334.
17. McLeod KJ, Collazo L. 2000. Suppression of a differentiation response in MC-3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells by sustained, low-level, 30 Hz magnetic-field exposure. Radiat Res 153:706-714.
18. Heermeier K, Spanner M, Trager J, et al. 1998. Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (EMF) on collagen type I mRNA expression and extracellular matrix synthesis of human osteoblastic cells. Bioelectromagnetics 19:222-231.
19. Ciombor DM, Lester G, Aaron RK, et al. 2002. Low frequency EMF regulates chondrocyte differentiation and expression of matrix proteins. J Orthop Res 20:40-50.
20. Liu H, Abbott J, Bee JA. 1996. Pulsed electromagnetic fields influence hyaline cartilage extracellular matrix composition without affecting molecular structure. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 4: 63-76.
21. Wang D, Christensen K, Chawla K, et al. 1999. Isolation and characterization of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast subclones with distinct in vitro and in vivo differentiation/mineralization potential. J Bone Miner Res 14:893-903.
22. Kodama H, Amagai Y, Sudo H, et al. 1981. Establishment of a clonal osteogenic cell line from newborn mouse calvaria. Jpn J Oral Biol 23:899-901.
23. Muschler GF, Nitto H, Boehm CA. 2001. Age- and gender-related changes in the cellularity of human bone marrow and the prevalence of osteoblastic progenitors. J Orthop Res 19:117-125.
24. Zborowski M, Midura RJ, Wolfman A, et al. 2003. Magnetic field visualization in applications to pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation of tissues. Ann Biomed Eng 31:195-206.
25. Bradford MM. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248-254.
26. Fukada E, Yasuda I. 1957. On the piezo-electric effect of bone. J Phys Soc Jpn 10:1158-1169.
27. Bernstein EF, Chen YQ, Kopp JB, et al. 1996. Long-term sun exposure alters the collagen of the papillary dermis. Comparison of sun-protected and photoaged skin by northern analysis, immunohistochemical staining, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 34: 209-218.
28. Fisher LW, Lindner W, Young MF, et al. 1989. Synthetic peptide antisera: their production and use in the cloning of matrix proteins. Connect Tissue Res 21:43-50.
29. Fisher LW, Stubbs JT III, Young MF. 1995. Antisera and cDNA probes to human and certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 266:61-65.
30. Gogly B, Groult N, Hornebeck W, et al. 1998. Collagen zymography as a sensitive and specific technique for the determination of subpicogram levels of interstitial collagenase. Anal Biochem 255: 211-216.
31. Metsaranta M, Toman D, De Crombrugghe B, et al. 1991. Specific hybridization probes for mouse type I, II, III and IX collagen mRNAs. Biochim Biophys Acta 1089:241-243.
32. Misakian M, Sheppard AR, Krause D, et al. 1993. Biological, physical, and electrical parameters for in vitro studies with ELF magnetic and electric fields: a primer. Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 2: 1-73.
33. Mizutani A, Sugiyama I, Kuno E, et al. 2001. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases during ascorbate-induced differentiation of osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. J Bone Miner Res 16:2043-2049.
34. Otter MW, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. 1998. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop 355:S90-S104.
35. Farndale RW, Murray JC. 1985. Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote collagen production in bone marrow fibroblasts via athermal mechanisms. Calcif Tissue Int 37:178-182.
36. Hartig M, Joos U, Wiesmann HP. 2000. Capacitively coupled electric fields accelerate proliferation of osteoblast-like primary cells and increase bone extracellular matrix formation in vitro. Eur Biophys J 29:499-506.
37. Guerkov HH, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, et al. 2001. Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase growth factor release by nonunion cells. Clin Orthop 384: 265-279.