Linguistic and nonlinguistic influences on the eyes' landing positions during reading

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 760-782

  White, Sarah J ^a   Liversedge, Simon P ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; READING; REVIEW; TIME; VISUAL FIELD;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; READING; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33645078931     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980543000024     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database, [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Beauvillain, C., & Doré, K. (1998). Orthographic codes are used in integrating information from the parafovea by the saccadic computation system. Vision Research, 38, 115-123.
3. Beauvillain, C., Doré, K., & Baudouin, V. (1996). The "centre of gravity" of words: Evidence for an effect of word-initial letters. Vision Research, 36, 589-603.
4. Becker, W., & Jürgens, R. (1979). An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Research, 19, 967-983.
5. Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 615-634.
6. Deutsch, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Initial fixation location effects in reading Hebrew words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 393-421.
7. Doré, K., & Beauvillain, C. (1997). Latency dependence of word-initial letter integration by the saccadic system. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 523-533.
8. Dunn-Rankin, P. (1978). The visual characteristics of words. Scientific American, 238, 122-130.
9. Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42, 621-636.
10. Hyönä, J. (1993). Eye movements during reading and discourse processing (Psychological Research Rep. No. 65). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
11. Hyönä, J. (1995). Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 68-81.
12. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
13. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2000). Processing of Finnish compound words in reading. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 65-87). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
14. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431-439.
15. Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M., & Shindler, K. L. (2000). Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1474-1484.
16. Kennedy, A. (1998). The influence of parafoveal words on foveal inspection time: Evidence for a processing trade off. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 149-179). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
17. Kennedy, A. (2000). Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 429-455.
18. Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68-81.
19. Lavigne, F., Vitu, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2000). The influence of semantic context on initial eye landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica, 104, 191-214.
20. Lima, S. D., & Inhoff, A. W. (1985). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word initial letter sequence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 272-285.
21. Liversedge, S. P., & Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 6-14
22. Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1998). Foveal processing load and landing position effects in reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 201-221). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
23. Liversedge, S. P., & White, S. J. (2003). Psycholinguistic processes affect fixation durations and orthographic information affects fixation locations: Can E-Z Reader cope? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 492-493.
24. McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research, 28, 1107-1118.
25. McConkie, G. W., &. Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578-586.
26. McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 221-224.
27. Morris, R. K., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1990). Eye movement guidance in reading: The role of parafoveal letter and space information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 268-281.
28. Morrison, R. E., & Inhoff, A. W. (1981). Visual factors and eye movements in reading. Visible Language, 15, 129-146.
29. O'Regan, K. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501-509.
30. O'Regan, K. (1980). The control of saccade size and fixation duration in reading: The limits of linguistic control. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 112-117.
31. O'Regan, J. K. (1990). Eye movements and reading. In E. Kowler (Ed.), Eye movments and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 395-453). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. O'Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185-197.
33. O'Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillère, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250-257.
34. O'Regan, J. K., Vitu, F., Radach, R., & Kerr, P. W. (1994). Effects of local processing and oculomotor factors in eye movement guidance in reading. In J. Ygge & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 329-348). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
35. Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984). Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413-428.
36. Paterson, D. G., &. Tinker, M. A. (1946). Readability of newspaper headlines printed in capitals and in lower cast. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 161-168.
37. Paterson, D. G., & Tinker, M. A. (1947). The effect of typography upon the perceptual span in reading. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 388-396.
38. Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2002). Does "whole-word shape" play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 785-794.
39. Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The role of word boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 817-833.
40. Pynte, J. (1996). Lexical control of within-word eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 958-969.
41. Pynte, J. (2000). Words likely to generate many lexical candidates are granted an advantage: Evidence from within-word eye movements. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 47-64). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
42. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Ducrot, S. (2004). The influence of parafoveal typographical errors in eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 178-202.
43. Pynte, J., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time course of perceptual, lexical and contextual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 458-470.
44. Radach, R., Inhoff, A., & Heller, D. (2004). Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 27-51.
45. Radach, R., & Kempe, V. (1993). An individual analysis of initial fixation positions in reading. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. Van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 213-226). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
46. Radach, R., Krummenacher, J, Heller, D., & Hofmeister, J. (1995). Individual eye movement patterns in word recognition: Perceptual and linguistic factors. In J. M. Findlay, R. Walker, & R. W. Kentridge (Eds.), Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes and applications (pp. 421-432). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
47. Radach, R., & McConkie, G. W. (1998). Determinants of fixation positions in words during reading. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 77-100). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
48. Rayner, K. (1975). Parafoveal identification during a fixation in reading. Acta Psychohgica, 39, 271-282.
49. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation locations within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
50. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
51. Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., &. Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading: Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41, 943-954.
52. Rayner, K., Fischer, M. H., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research, 38, 1129-1144.
53. Rayner, K., & McConkie, G. W. (1976). What guides a reader's eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829-837.
54. Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206-226.
55. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351-373.
56. Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188-1200.
57. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Kambe, G., Miller, B., & Liversedge, S.P. (2003). On the processing of meaning from parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 213-234). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
58. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Eye movement control in reading: Accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z reader model. Vision Research, 39, 4403-4411.
59. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z Reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445-526.
60. Reilly, R. G., & O'Regan, J. K. (1998). Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some wordtargeting strategies. Vision Research, 38, 303-317.
61. Reilly, R. G., & Radach, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 429-455). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
62. Tinker, M. A., & Paterson, D. G. (1939). Influence of type form on eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 528-531.
63. Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 285-318.
64. Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O'Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513-3533.
65. Vitu, F., O'Regan, J. K., & Mittau, M. (1990). Optimal landing position in reading isolated words and continuous texts. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 583-600.
66. Vonk, W., Radach, R., Sevan Rijn, H. (2000). Eye guidance and the saliency of word beginnings in reading text. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 269-299). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
67. White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 52-78.
68. Yang, S.-N., & McConkie, G. W. (2001). Eye movements during reading: A theory of saccade initiation time. Vision Research, 41, 3567-3585.