The Black-White achievement gap: Do state policies matter?

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 14, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-107

  Braun, Henry I ^a   Wang, Aubrey ^b   Jenkins, Frank ^c   Weinbaum, Elliot ^d  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b Dental School of Philadelphia   (United States)

^c WESTAT   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Achievement gap; Hierarchical analyses; National assessment of educational progress (NAEP); State education policies

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645073411     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: 10682341     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v14n8.2006     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. American Federation of Teachers. (1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997). AFT 50-state teacher salary survey. Retrieved as an excel spreadsheet on November 2003 from http://www.aft.org/research/salary/stgrave/ Index.htm
2. American Federation of Teachers. (1995). Making standards matter 1995: A fifty-state progress report on efforts to raise academic standards, Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Federation of Teachers. (1990). Making standards matter 1996: An annual fifty-state report on efforts to raise academic standards, Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Federation of Teachers. (1958). Making standards matter 1998: An annual fifty-state report on efforts to raise academic standards, Washington, DC: Author.
5. Carnoy, M. & Loeb, S. (2002). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 305-331.
6. Coley, R. J. and Goertz, M. E. (1990). Educational standards in the 50 states: 1990. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
7. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (1990). Teacher professional development profile: Kentucky, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
8. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2000). Assessment and Accountability in the Fifty States: Survey 2000: Kentucky Assessment and Accountability Profile, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved June, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/.
10. Goertz, M. E. (1988). State educational standards in the 50 states: An update, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11. Hussar, W. & Sonnenberg, W. (2000). Trends in disparities in school district level expenditures per pupil (NCES 2000-020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
12. Ingersoll, R. M. (2003). Out-of-field teaching and the limits of teacher policy: A research report co-sponsored by Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy and the Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Seattle, Washington: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
13. Kentucky Department of Education. (2000). State of Kentucky profile 1999-2000. Lexington, KY: Author. Retrieved December 12, 2003, from http://www.kde.state.ky.us.
14. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (1988). Manual on certification and preparation of educational personnel in the United States. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
15. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (1991). Manual on certification and preparation of educational personnel in the United States. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
16. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (1996). Manual on certification and preparation of educational personnel in the United States. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
17. National Association of State Directors of Teacher Education and Certification. (2000). Manual on certification and preparation of educational personnel in the United States, Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
18. National Center for Education Statistics. (1993). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1992-93. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
19. National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1993-94, Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
20. National Center for Education Statistics. (1995). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1994-95. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
21. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1995-96. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
22. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1996-97. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
23. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1997-98. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
24. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 1998-99, Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
25. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: School year 1999-2000. Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
26. National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Statistics in brief: Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: Schoolyear 2000-2001, Retrieved December 7, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ pub_rev_exp.asp.
27. Rhoten, D., Carnoy, M., Chabran, M., & Elmore, R. (2003). The conditions and characteristics of assessment and accountability: The case of four states. In Martin Carnoy, Richard Elmore, and Leslie Santee Siskin (Eds.), The new accountability: High schools and high-stakes testing (pp. 13-53). New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.