A comparative study on the anatomy and development of different shapes of domatia in Cinnamomum camphora (Lauraceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 601-610

  Nishida, Sachiko ^a   Tsukaya, Hirokazu ^b,d   Nagamasu, Hidetoshi ^c   Nozaki, Masumi ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anatomy; Cavity formation; Cinnamomum camphora; Development; Domatia; Lauraceae

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; MITE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; SYMBIOSIS;

ANIMALS; CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA; MITES; PLANT LEAVES; SYMBIOSIS;

ACARI; CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA; DRYOBALANOPS; LAURACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 33645067137     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Agrawal AA. 1997. Do leaf domatia mediate a plant-mite mutualism? An experimental test of the effects on predators andherbi vores. Ecological Entomology 22: 371-376.
2. Cerana MM, Ariza Espinar L. 1995. Sobre la presencia de domacios en Mikania (Asteraceae). Kurtziana 24: 7-18.
3. Donnelly PM, Bonetta D, Tsukaya H, Dengler R, Dengler NG. 1999. Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Developmental Biology 215: 407-419.
4. Esau K. 1960. Anatomy of seed plants, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
5. Granier C, Turc O, Tardieu F. 2000. Co-ordination of cell division and tissue expansion in sunflower, tobacco and pea leaves. Dependence or independence of both processes? Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 19: 45-54.
6. Grostal P, O'Dowd DJ. 1994. Plants, mites and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97: 308-315.
7. Hamilton AG. 1897. On domatia in certain Australian and other plants. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 21: 758-792.
8. Huxley CR. 1978. The ant-plants Myrmecodia and Hydnophytum (Rubiaceae), and the relationships between their morphology, ant occupants, physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 80: 231-268.
9. Jacobs M. 1966. On domatia - the viewpoints and some facts. Academie van Wetennschappen Amsterdam 69: 275-316.
10. Kasai A, Yano S, Nishida T, Kadono F, Takafuji A. 2002a. Spatial distribution pattern of domatia and seasonal occurrence of the eriophyid mite in relation to the foliation phenology of Cinnamomum camphora. Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology 46: 159-162.
11. Kasai A, Yano S, Takafuji A. 2002b. Density of the eriophyid mites inhabiting the domatia of Cinnamomum camphora Linn. affects the density of the predatory mites, Amblyseius sojaensis Ehara (Acari: Phytoseiidae), not inhabiting the domatia. Applied Entomology and Zoology 37: 617-619.
12. Lundström AN. 1887. Pflanzenbiologische Studien. II. Dei Anpassungen der Pflanzen an Thiere. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis 3: 1-87.
13. Mabberley DJ. 1997. The plant-book. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Martinez-Solis I, Iranzo J, Estrelle E, Ibras M. 1993. Leaf domatia in the section Alaternus (Miller) DC. of the genus Rhamnus (Rhamunaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 112: 311-318.
15. Nishida S. 2004. Morphology and function of domatia. Bunrui 4: 137-150.
16. Nishida S, Naiki A, Nishida T. 2005. Morphological variation in leaf domatia enables coexistence of antagonistic mites in Cinnamomum camphora. Canadian Journal of Botany 83: 1-9.
17. Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Belden E. 2001. Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126: 535-542.
18. O'Dowd DJ, Willson MF. 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37: 191-236.
19. Pemberton RW, Turner CE. 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. American Journal of Botany 76: 105-112.
20. Poethig RS, Sussex IM. 1985. The cellular parameters of leaf development in tobacco Nicotiana tabacum: a clonal analysis. Planta 165: 170-184.
21. SAS Institute Inc. 2000. JMP, Version 4. North Carolina: SAS Institute Inc.
22. Schnell R, Cusset G, Tchinaye V, Tô Ngoc Anh. 1968. Contribution à l'étude des 'acarodomaties' la question des aisselles de nervures. Revue Générale de Botanique 75: 5-64.
23. Takaso T, Tobe H, Aida M. 1997. Procedure and observation techniques of sections for optical microscope. In: Fukuda H, Nishimura M, Nakamura K, eds. Experimental protocol for observation of plant cells. Tokyo: Shujunsha, 20-33.
24. Tô Ngoc Anh. 1966. Sur la structure anatomique et l'ontogénèse des acarodomaties et les interprétations morphologiques qui paraissent s'en dégager. Adansonia 6: 147-151.
25. Walter DE, O'Dowd DJ. 1992. Leaf morphology and predators: effect of leaf domatia on the abundance of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environmental Entomology 21: 478-484.
26. Wilkinson HP. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf), part IV domatia. In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L, eds. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, 2nd edn, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 132-140.