Sustained suppression in congruency tasks

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 178-189

  Notebaert, Wim ^a   Soetens, Eric ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; COGNITION; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REACTION TIME;

EID: 33645059497     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500151360     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Band, G. P. H., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (2003). Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: The roles of activation and inhibition. Psychological Research, 67, 266-279.
2. Burle, B., Possamaï, C. A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324-336.
3. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-533.
4. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., & Budayr, B. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211-1214.
5. De Jong, R., Berendsen, E., & Cools, R. (1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379-394.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity; A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. Dunbar, K., & MacLeod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622-639.
8. Eimer, M. (1997). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of automatic response activation in S-R compatibility situations. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 51-73). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
9. Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (1998). Effects of masked stimuli on motor activation: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1737-1747.
10. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
11. Glaser, M. O., & Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875-894.
12. Hommel, B. (1993). The role of attention for the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 55, 208-222.
13. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus -response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
14. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
15. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 126-135.
16. Morein-Zamir, S., Henik, A., & Spitzer-Davidson, I. (2002). The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the Stroop flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 119-125.
17. Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
18. Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 387-397.
19. Neill, W. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444-450.
20. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1994). Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes. Psychological Research, 56, 144-150.
21. Notebaert, W., &. Soetens, E. (2003). Irrelevant auditory attention shifts prime corresponding responses. Psychological Research, 67, 253-260.
22. Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170-184.
23. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312-323.
24. Ridderinkhof, K. R., & van der Molen, M. W. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of developmental differences in the ability to resist interference. Child Development, 66, 1040-1054.
25. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., &. Zuccolotto, A. (2002b) E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
26. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., &. Zuccolotto, A. (2002a) E-Prime user's guide, Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
27. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
28. Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focusing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.
29. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
30. Thomas, J. K. (1977). Stroop interference with word or hue pre-exposure. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 1450.
31. White, B. W. (1969). Interference in identifying attributes and attribute names. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 166-168.