Müllerian dysgenesis: A review of recent outcomes at Royal Hospital for Women

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 29-31

  Mizia, Karen ^a,b   Bennett, Michael J ^a,b   Dudley, Jan ^a   Morrisey, Jennifer ^a  

^a ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR WOMEN   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

M llerian dysgenesis; Non surgical therapy; Vaginpoplasty

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GONADAL DYSGENESIS; GYNECOLOGY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMATOCOLPOS; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; PATIENT REFERRAL; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA APLASIA; VAGINA RECONSTRUCTION;

ABNORMALITIES, MULTIPLE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AMENORRHEA; DILATATION; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MULLERIAN DUCTS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICALLY-CREATED STRUCTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINA;

EID: 33645057913     PISSN: 00048666     EISSN: 1479828X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2006.00510.x     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Varner RE, Younger JB, Blackwell RE. Müllerian dysgenesis. J Reprod Med. 1985; 30: 443-450.
2. Frank RT. The formation of an artificial vagina without operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938; 35: 1053.
3. Hensle TW, Reiley EA. Vaginal replacement in children and young adults. J Urol. 1998; 159: 1035-1038.
4. Roberts C, Haber MJ, Rock J. Vaginal creation for Müllerian agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 1349-1353.
5. Nadarajah S, Quek J, Rose GL, Edmonds DK. Sexual function in women treated with dilators for vaginal agenesis. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005; 18: 39-34.
6. Kaloo P, Cooper M. Laparoscopic-assosted Vecchietti procedure for creation of a neovagina: An analysis of five cases. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 42: 307-310.
7. Ozek C, Gurler T, Alper M. Modified McIndoe procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 43: 393-396.
8. Ashworth MF, Morton KE, Dewhurst J, Lilford RJ, Bates RG. Vaginoplasty using amnion. Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 67: 443-446.
9. Alessandrescu D, Peltecu GC, Buhimschi CS et al. Neocolpopoiesis with split thickness skin graft as a surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: a retrospective review of 201 cases. Am J Ostet Gynecol. 1996; 175: 131-138.
10. Chen Y, Cheng T. Spatial w-plasty full thickness skin graft for neovaginal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994; 94: 727-731.
11. National Health and Medical Research Council. When does Quality Assurance in Health Care Require Independent Ethical Review? 2003. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/_files/e46.pdf
12. Atkinson E, Bennett MJ, Dudley J et al. Consensus statement: The management of congenital tract anomalies in women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003; 43: 107-108.