Nested and overlapping regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 362-382

  Alter, Karen J ^a,b   Meunier, Sophie ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bananas; European Union; Institutions; Nesting; Trade; WTO

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644995654     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501760600560409     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Abbott, K. and Snidal, D. (1998) 'Why states act through formal international organizations', Journal of Conflict Resolution 42: 3-32.
2. Abbott, K. and Snidal, D. (2000) 'Hard and soft law in international governance', International Organization 54: 421-56.
3. Abbott, K. and Snidal, D. (2003) 'Pathways to international cooperation', in E. Benvenisti and M. Hirsch (eds), The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 50-84.
4. Aggarwal, V.K. (1998) Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Alter, K.J. (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Alter, K.J. (2003) 'Resolving or exacerbating disputes? The WTO's new dispute resolution system', International Affairs 79: 783-800.
7. Bessko, Z. (1996) 'Going bananas over EEC preferences? A look at the banana trade war and the WTO's understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes', Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 28: 265.
8. Bourgeois, J.H.J. (2000) 'The European Court and the WTO: problems and challenges', in J.H.H. Weiler (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a Common Law of Trade, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71-123.
9. Gordon, P.H. and Meunier, S. (2001) The French Challenge: Adapting to Globalization, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
10. Hanrahan, C. (1999) 'The US-European Union banana dispute', CRS Report RS20130.
11. Hathaway, O. (2004) Between Power and Principle: A Political Theory of International Law, University of Chicago Law Review 71, May 2005.
12. Helfer, L. (2004) 'Regime shifting: the TRIPS Agreement and new dynamics of international intellectual property making', The Yale Journal of International Law 29: 1-81.
13. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
14. Josling, T.E. (2003) 'Bananas and the WTO: testing the new dispute settlement process', in T.E. Josling and T.G. Taylor (eds), Banana Wars the Anatomy of a Trade Dispute, Institute for International Studies Stanford University, California, pp. 169-94.
15. Lyons, R. (1994) 'European Union banana controversy', Florida Journal of International Law 9: 165-88.
16. Meunier, S. and Nicolaidis, K. (1999) 'Who speaks for Europe? The delegation of trade authority in the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 477-501.
17. Putnam, R. (1988) 'Diplomacy and domestic politics; the logic of two level games', International Organization 42: 427-60.
18. Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. (2004) 'The regime complex for plant genetic resources', International Organization 58: 277-309.
19. Rodden, J. (2001) 'German Banana Republic?', Culture and Society 38: 68-74.
20. Salas, M. and Jackson, J.H. (2000) 'Procedural overview of the WTO EC-banana dispute', Journal of International Economic Law 3(1): 145-66.
21. Sander, G.G. (1998) 'The EC banana regime - a test case for the relationship between WTO, regional and national law', Working Paper, University of Tubingen.
22. Shanks, C., Jacobson, H.K. and Kaplan, J.H. (1996) 'Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981-1992', International Organization 50: 593-627.
23. Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) A New World Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. McCall Smith, J. (2000) 'The politics of dispute settlement design', International Organization 54: 137-80.
25. McCall Smith, J. (2005) 'Compliance bargaining in the WTO: Ecuador and the banana dispute', in J. Odell (ed.), In Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Stein, N. (2001) 'Yes we have no profits', Fortune 144(11): 182-96.
27. Stovall, J.G. and Hathaway, D.E. (2003) 'US interests in the banana trade controversy', in T.E. Josling and T.G. Taylor (eds), Banana Wars: The Anatomy of a Trade Dispute, Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, California, pp. 151-68.
28. Sutton, P. (1997) 'The banana regime of the European Union, the Caribbean, and Latin America', Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs 39: 5-36.
29. Tangermann, S. (2003) 'European interests in the banana market', in T.E. Josling and T.G. Taylor (eds), Banana Wars: The Anatomy of a Trade Dispute, Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, California, pp. 45-60.
30. Taylor, T.G. (2003) 'Evolution of banana multinationals', in T.E. Josling and T.G. Taylor (eds), Banana Wars: The Anatomy of a Trade Dispute, pp. 67-96.
31. Tsebelis, G. (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Webber, D. and Cadot, O. (2002) 'Banana splits: policy process, particularistic interests, political capture, and money in transatlantic trade politics', Business and Politics 4: 109.