Achievement and affect in OECD nations

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 517-545

  Williams, Trevor ^a,b   Williams, Kitty ^a,b   Kastberg, David ^a,b   Jocelyn, Leslie ^a,b  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644990907     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054980500355427     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adams, R. (2002) Scaling PISA cognitive data, in: R. Adams & M. Wu (Eds) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD), 99-108.
2. Adams, R. & Carstensen, C. (2002) Scaling outcomes, in: R. Adams & M, Wu (Eds) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD), 149-162.
3. Adams, R. & Wu, M. (2002) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD).
4. Archer, M. (1979) Social origins of education systems (London, Sage).
5. Archer, M. (1989) Cross-national research and the analysis of educational systems, in: M. Kohn (Rd.) Cross-national research in sociology (London, Sage), 242-262.
6. Bandura, A. (1977) Social learning theory (Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall)
7. andura, A. (1978) The self system in reciprocal determinism, American Psychologist, 33, 344-358.
8. Baumen, J., Schnabel, K. & Lehrke, M. (1998) Learning math in school: Does interest really matter? in: L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds) Interest and learning (Kiel, Institute for Science Education), 327-336.
9. Bcaton, A. & Gonzlalcz, E. (1995) NAEP primer (Chestnut Hill, Boston College).
10. Berry, W. D. (1984) Non-recursive causal models (Beverly Hills, Sage Publications).
11. Blalock, H. M. Jr. (1969) Theory construction (Englewood Cliff's, Prentice-Hall).
12. Bloom, B. (1976) Human characteristics and school learning (New York, McGraw-Hill).
13. Brooks-Gunn, J. & Duncan, G. J, (1997) The effects of poverty on children, Future Child, 7(2), 55 71.
14. Brophy, J. (1985) Interactions of male and female students with their male and female teachers, in: L. C. Wilkinson & C. B. Marett (Eds) Gender influences in classroom interaction (New York, Academy Press), 115-142.
15. Campbell, J., Voelkl, K. & Donahue, P. (1997) NAEP 1996 trends in academic progress (Washington, US Department of Education).
16. Carroll, J. B. (1963) A model of school learning, Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
17. Cooky, W. W. & Leinhart, G. (1975) The application of a model for investigating classroom processes (Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh).
18. Comber, L. C. & Keeves, J. P. (1973) Science education in nineteen countries: an empirical study (New York, Wiley).
19. Dewey, J. (1913) Interest and effort in education (Boston, Riverside Press).
20. Dunean, O. D. (1975) Introduction to structural equation models (New York, Academic Press).
21. Hecks, J. S. (1987) Gender roles and achievement patterns: an expectancy value prospective, in: J. M. Reiniseh, L. A. Rosemblum & S. A. Sanders (Eds) Masculinity/femininity: basic perspectives (New York, Oxford University Press), 240-280.
22. Eisenhardt, W. B. (1976) A search for the predominant causal sequence in the interrelationship of interest in academic subjects and academic achievement, A cross-lagged panel correlation study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Duke University, Durham, NC).
23. Ethington, C. (1991) A test of a model of achievement behaviors, American Educational Research-Journal, 28, 155-172.
24. Evans, K. (1971) Attitudes and interests in education (London, Routkdge & Kegan Paul).
25. Fisher, F. M. (1971) The choice of instrumental variables in the estimation of economy-wide econometric models, in: H.M. Blalock, Jr. (Ed.) Causal models in the social sciences (Chicago, Aldine-Atherton), 245-272.
26. Erandscn, A. & Sorenson, M. (1969) Interests and school achievement, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 13, 94-101.
27. Ganzeboom, H. B. & Treiman, D. J. (1996) Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations, Social Science Research, 25, 201-239.
28. Guthrie, J. T. & Wigfield, A. (2000) Engagement and motivation in reading, in: M. L. Karnil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds) Reading research handbook (Vol. III) (Mahwah, Erlbaum), 403-424.
29. Hacket, G. & Campbell, N. K. (1987) Task self-efficacy and task interest as a function of perfor-mance on gender-neutral task, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 203-215.
30. Harnischfeger, A. & Wiley, D. E. (1976) The teaching learning process in elementary schools: a synoptic view, Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 5-43.
31. Harter, S. & Guzman, M. E. (1986) The effects of perceived cognitive competence and anxiety on children's problem-solving performance, difficulty level choices, and preference for challenge (Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver, Denver, CO).
32. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1995) Evaluating model fit, in: R. H. Hoylc (Ed.) Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues and applications (Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications), 76-99.
33. Husén, T. (1967) International study of achievement in mathematics (Vols. 1 and 2) (Stockholm, Almqvist & Wicksell).
34. Inkeks, A. (1977) International evaluation of education achievement-a review, Proceedings of the National Academy of Education, 4, 139-200.
35. Johnson, M., Crosnoe, R. & Elder, G. (2001) Student attachment and academic engagement: the role of ethnicity, Sociology of Education, 74, 318-340.
36. Jorcskog, K. & Sorbom, D. (1996) LISRHL 8 user's reference guide (Chicago, Scientific Software International, Inc.).
37. Kaplan, D., Harik, P. & Hotchkiss, L. (2001) Cross-sectional estimation of dynamic structural equation models in disequilibrium, in: R. Cudek, S. Du Toit & D. Sorbom (Eds) Structural equation modeling: present and future (Chicago, Scientific Software International, Inc.), 315-340.
38. Kcrckhoff, A. (1991) Creating inequality in schools: a structural perspective, in: J. Hubcr (Ed.) Macro-micro linkages in sociology (Newbury Park, Sage), 153-169.
39. Kirsch, L, de Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J. & Monseur, C. (2002) Reading for change: performance and- engagement across countries; results from PISA 2000 (Paris, OECD).
40. Klein, L. (1962) Elements of econometrics (Engkwood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall).
41. Kohn, M. L. (1969) Class and conformity; a study in -values (Homcwood, Dorscy Press).
42. Köller, O., Baumert, J. & Schnabel, K. (1998) The impact of academic self-concepts of ability on the development of interest during adolescence, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
43. Koller, O., Baumert, J. & Schnabel, K. (2001) Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448-470.
44. Krawchuk, S. & Rust, K. (2002) Sample design, in: R. Adams & M. Wu (Eds) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD), 39-55.
45. Lopez, K G., Lent, R. W., Brown, D. D. & Gore, P. A. (1997) Role of social-cognitive expectations in high school students' mathematics-related interest and performance, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 44-52.
46. Marsh, H. W. (1990) The causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: a multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646-656.
47. Marsh, H. W. (1993) The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: invariance over gender and age, American Education Research-Journal, 30, 841-860.
48. Marsh, H. & Yeung, A. S. (1998) Longitudinal structural equation models of academic self concept and achievement: gender difference in development of math and English constructs, American Educational Research Journal, 35, 705-735.
49. McKenna, M., Kcar, D. & Ellsworth, R. (1995) Children's attitudes towards reading: a national survey, Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 934-956.
50. McLoyd, V. C. (1998) Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development, American Psychology, 53, 185-204.
51. Meece, J. L., Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., Goff, S. B. & Eutlerman, R. (1982) Sex differences in math achievement: toward a model of academic choice. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 324-348.
52. Meyer, J. & Hannan, M. (1979) National development and the world education system: educational, economic and political change, 1950-1970 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
53. Miller, D. & Paxson, C. (2001) Relative income, race, and mortality, Working Paper, July 2001 (Princeton University, Center for Health and Wellbeing).
54. Milne, A. M. (1989) Family structure and the achievement of children, in: W. J. Weston (Ed) Education and the American family: a research synthesis (New York, New York University Press), 32-65.
55. Mislevy, R., Johnson, E. & Muraki, E. (1992) Scaling procedures in NAEP, Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 131-154.
56. Muthen, L. & Muthcn, B. (1998) Mptus user's guide (Los Angeles, Muthcn & Muthen).
57. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000) Measuring student knowledge and skills (Paris, OECD).
58. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001) Knowledge and skills for life: first results from PISA 2000 (Paris, OECD).
59. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002a) Education policy analysis (Paris, OECD).
60. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2002b) Manual for the PISA 2000 database (Paris, OECD).
61. Pajarcs, F. & Schunk, D. (2001) Self-beliefs and school success: self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement, in: R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds) Perception (London, Ablex Publishing), 239-266.
62. Psacharopoulos, G. (1973) Returns to education (San Erancisco, Josscy-Bass).
63. Ramirez, F. & Meyer, J. (1980) Comparative education: the social construction of the modern world system, Annual Review of Sociology (Palo Alto, Annual Reviews, Inc), 369-399.
64. Raudenbush, S., Cheong, Y. & Fotiu, R. (1994) Synthesizing cross-national classroom effects data: alternative models and methods, in: M. Binkley & K. Rust (Eds) Methodological issues in comparative educational studies: the case of the IEA Reading Literacy Study (Washington, National Center for Education Statistics), 243-286.
65. Rubin, D. (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys (New York, Wiley).
66. Rychen, D. & Salganik, L. (2002) Defining and selecting key competencies (Seattle, Hogrefe & Huber).
67. Saegert, S. & Winkel, G. H. (1990) Environmental psychology, Annual Re-view of Psychology, 41, 441-477.
68. Schiefele, U. (1998) Individual interest and learning what we know and what we do not know, in: L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds) Interest and learning (Kiel, Institute for Science Education), 91-104.
69. Schiefcle, U., Krapp, A. & Schreyer, I. (1993) Mctaanalyse des Zusammenhangs von Interesse und schulischer Leistung, Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25(2), 120-148.
70. th biennial meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development, Munich.
71. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A. & Winteler, A. (1992) Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research, in: K. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds) The role of interest in learning and development (Hillsdale, Erlbaum).
72. Schulz, W. (2002) Constructing and validating the questionnaire indices, in: R. Adams & M. Wu (Eds) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD), 217-257.
73. Singh, K., Granville, M. & Dika, S. (2002) Mathematics and science achievement: effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement, The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
74. Sjoberg, L. (1983) Interest, achievement and vocational choice, European Journal of Science Education, 5, 299-307.
75. Sjöberg, L. (1984) Interest, effort, achievement and vocational preference, British Jonmal of Educational Psychology, 54, 189-205.
76. Stevenson, H., Lee, S. & Stigler, J. (1986) Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese and American children, Science, 231, 693-699.
77. Treiman, D. (1977) Occupational prestige in comparative perspective (New York, Academic Press).
78. Warm, T. A. (1985) Weighted maximum likelihood estimation of ability in Item Response Theory using tests of finite length, Technical Report CGI-TR-85-08 (Oklahoma City, US Coast Guard Institute).
79. Willson, V. L. (1983) A meta-analysis of the relationship between science achievement and science attitude: kindergarten through college, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 839-850.
80. Wu, M. (2002) Test design and development, in: R. Adams & M. Wu (Eds) PISA 2000 technical report (Paris, OECD), 21-31.