Three decades of rural development projects in Asia, Latin America, and Africa: Learning from successes and failures

International Development Planning Review

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 271-296

  Zoomers, Annelies ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RURAL DEVELOPMENT;

AFRICA; ASIA; EURASIA; LATIN AMERICA;

EID: 33644985474     PISSN: 14746743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/idpr.27.3.2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BAMBERGER, M. and HEWITT, E. (1986), Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Development Programs. A Handbook for Program Managers and Researchers, World Bank Technical Paper no.53, Washington, DC, World Bank.
2. BRYCESON, D., VAN DIJK H., HOWARD, P., OORTHUIZEN, J. and ZOOMERS, A. (2005), The Sector Wide Approach in Rural Development. Finding Ways to Alleviate Poverty and Promote Ecological Sustainability, report on behalf of CERES: Research School for Resource Studies for Development.
3. CARLSSON, J. and WOHLGEMUTH, L. (2000), Learning in Development Cooperation, Expert Group on Development Issues (EGDI) 2.
4. DGIS (2000), Working Document: GAVIM and the Sectoral Approach, The Hague, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
5. DGIS (2003a), Aan elkaar verplicht. Ontwikkelingssamenwerking op weg naar 2015, The Hague, Ministerie voor Buitenlandse Zaken (DGIS).
6. DGIS (2003b), Sectorale benadering, organiserend principe voor de bilaterale ontwikkelingssamenwerking, groeidocument 2, The Hague, Ministerie voor Buitenlandse Zaken (DGIS), Steungroep sectorale benadering.
7. EUFORIC (2004), Europe's Forum on International Cooperation (www.euforic.org).
8. FOSTER, M. (2000), New Approaches to Development Co-operation: What Can We Learn from Experience with Implementing Sector Wide Approaches?, Working Paper 140, Overseas Development Institute, Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure, London.
9. FOSTER M., BROWN, A. and NASCHOLD, A. (2000), 'What's different about agricultural SWAps?', paper presented at DFID Natural Resources Advisers conference, Centre for Aid and Public Expenditure (CAPE), London, 1O-14 July.
10. GRINSPUN, A. (2001), Choices for the Poor. Lessons from National Poverty Strategies, New York, United Nations Development Program.
11. LIVINGSTONE, I. (1979), 'On the concept of integrated rural development planning in less developed countries', Journal of Agricultural Economics, 30, 49-53.
12. MAYHEW, S. (2002), 'Donor dealings: the impact of international donor aid on sexual and reproductive health services', International Family Planning Perspectives, 28, 220-24.
13. OECD/DAc (1991), DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, Paris, Development Assistance Committee.
14. OECD/DAC (1996), Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Cooperation, Paris, Development Assistance Committee.
15. OECD/DAC (1998), Review of the DAC Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance, Paris, Development Assistance Committee, DAC working party on aid evaluation.
16. REARDON, T., BERDEGUÉ, J. and ESCOBAR, G. (2001), 'Rural nonfarm employment and incomes in Latin America: overview and policy implications', World Development, 29, 395-409.
17. SCHULPEN L. (ed.) (2001), Hulp in ontwikkeling: bouwstenen voor de toekomst van internationale samenwerking, Assen, van Gorcum.
18. UNDP (2004), Human Development Report 2004, New York, United Nations Development Program.
19. ZOOMERS, E.B. and GEURTEN, G. (1991), 'A decade of integrated rural development planning: an assessment of PRODERM experiences in Cusco, Peru', Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 82, 195-205.