Bridging the "Know-Do" Gap in Healthcare Priority-Setting: What Role has Academic Research Played?

Healthcare Management Forum

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 26-32

  Menon, Devidas ^a   Stafinski, Tania ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPED COUNTRY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MANAGEMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW;

DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; POLICY MAKING; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33644985441     PISSN: 08404704     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60066-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. World Health Organization; 2004, Vol. 82, No. 10. Available at: www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/82/10/en/.
2. Grey J. How to make health policy and management decisions. Evidence based healthcare (2001), Livingstone, Edinburgh, Churchill
3. About CHSRF. Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2005. Available at: www.chsrf.org/about/do_statement_purposes_e.php
4. Mullen P.M. Quantifying priorities in healthcare: Transparency or illusion?. Health Services Management Research 17 1 (2004) 47-58
5. White H.D., Bates M.J., and Wilson P. Tactics and vocabularies in online searching. In: For information specialists: Interpretations of reference and bibliographic work (1992), Ablex, Norwood, NJ
6. Cooper H., and Hedges L. The handbook of research synthesis (1994), Russell Sage Foundation, New York
7. Dickerson K., Scherer R., and Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. In: Chalmers I., and Altman G. (Eds). Systematic reviews (1995), BMJ Publishing Group, London 3 17-35
8. Neutens J., and Rubinson L. Research techniques for the health sciences. 2nd ed (1997), Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA
9. In: Crabtree B.F., and Miller W.L. (Eds). Doing qualitative research (1992), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
10. Giacomini M.K., and Cook D.J. Users' guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative research in healthcare: Are the results of the study valid?. JAMA 284 3 (2000) 357-362
11. Murphy E., Dingwall R., Greatbatch D., Parker S., and Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: A review of the literature. Health Assess (1998) 2
12. Mays N., and Pope C. Rigour in qualitative research. In: Qualitative research in healthcare (1996), BMJ Books, London
13. Strauss A., and Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures of developing grounded theory (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Mitton C., and Donaldson C. Twenty-five years of programme budgeting and marginal analysis in the health sector, 1974-1999. J Health Serv Res Policy 6 4 (2001) 239-248
15. Kuzel A., and Like R.C. Standards of trustworthiness for qualitative studies in primary care. In: Norton P., Stewart M., Tudiver F., Bass M., and Dunn E. (Eds). Primary care research: Traditional and innovative approaches (1991), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
16. Stepan A., and Sommersguter-Reichmann M. Priority setting in Austria. Health Policy 50 1-2 (1999) 91-104
17. Rissanen P., and Hakkinen U. Priority-setting in Finnish healthcare. Health Policy 50 (1999) 143-153
18. Busse R. Priority-setting and rationing in German healthcare. Health Policy 50 1-2 (1999) 71-90
19. Chinitz D., Shalev C., Lev B., et al. Israel's basic basket of health services: The importance of being explicitly implicit. In: Coulter A., and Ham C. (Eds). The global challenge of healthcare rationing (2000), Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA 44-51
20. Ham C. Priority setting in healthcare: Learning from international experience. Health Policy 42 (1997) 49-66
21. Ham C. Synthesis: What can we learn from the international experience?. Br Med Bull 51 4 (1995) 819-830
22. Hadorn D.C., and Holmes A.C. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview. BMJ 314 7074 (1996) 131-134
23. Campbell A.V. Defining core health services: The New Zealand experience. Bioethics 9 3-4 (1995) 252-258
24. Cumming J. Core services and priority-setting: The New Zealand experience. Health Policy 29 1-2 (1994) 41-60
25. Calltorp J. Priority setting in health policy in Sweden and a comparison with Norway. Health Policy 50 1-2 (1999) 1-22
26. Holm S. The second phase of priority setting. Goodbye to the simple solutions: The second phase of priority setting in healthcare. BMJ 317 7164 (1998) 1000-1002
27. Gaminde I. Priorities in healthcare: A perspective from Spain. Health Policy 50 1-2 (1999) 55-70
28. McKee M., and Figueras J. Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?. BMJ 312 7032 (1996) 691-694
29. Newdick C. Resource allocation in the National Health Service. Am J Law Med 23 2-3 (1997) 291-318
30. Blumstein J.F. The Oregon experiment: The role of cost-benefit analysis in the allocation of Medicaid funds. Soc Sci Med 45 4 (1997) 545-554
31. Kitzhaber J.A. Prioritising health services in an era of limits: The Oregon experience. BMJ 307 6900 (1993) 373-377
32. Mitton C., and Donaldson C. Setting priorities in Canadian regional health authorities: A survey of key decision makers. Health Policy 60 1 (2002) 39-58
33. Schopper D., Torres A.M., Pereira J., et al. Setting health priorities in a Swiss canton: What do different methods tell us?. J Epidemiol Community Health 54 5 (2000) 388-393
34. Hope T. Rationing and life-saving treatments: Should identifiable patients have higher priority?. J Med Ethics 27 (2001) 179-185
35. Scott S.N., and Lees A. Developing a prioritisation framework: Experiences from a Scottish Health Authority. Health Expectations 4 1 (2001) 10-17
36. New B., and Le Grand J. Rationing in the NHS: Principles and pragmatism (1996), King's Fund, London
37. Madden L., Hussey R., Mooney G., et al. Public health and economics in tandem: Programme budgeting, marginal analysis and priority setting in practice. Health Policy 33 2 (1995) 161-168
38. Twaddle S., and Walker A. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: Application within programmes to assist purchasing in Greater Glasgow Health Board. Health Policy 33 2 (1995) 91-105
39. Kears D.J., and Lum R.G. Rationing: The Alameda county experience. In: Blank R.H., and Bonnicksen A.L. (Eds). Emerging issues in biomedical policy: An annual review volume 1 (1992), Columbia University Press, New York 125-145
40. Mitton C., Donaldson C., Dean S., et al. Program budgeting and marginal analysis: A priority-setting framework for Canadian Regional Health Authorities. Healthcare Management Forum 13 4 (2000) 24-31
41. Allen D., Lee R.H., and Lowson K. The use of QALYS (quality-adjusted life years) in health service planning. Int J Health Plan Management 4 4 (1989) 261-273
42. Farrar S., Ryan M., Ross D., et al. Using discrete choice modeling in priority setting: An application to clinical service developments. Soc Sci Med 50 1 (2000) 63-75
43. Posnett J., and Street A. Programme budgeting and marginal analysis: An approach to priority setting in need of refinement. J Health Serv Res Policy 1 3 (1996) 147-153
44. Charlton J., Patrick D., Matthews G., et al. Spending priorities in Kent: A Delphi study. J Epidemiol Community Health 35 (1981) 288-292
45. Vilnius D., and Dandoy S. A priority rating system for public health programs. Public Health Reports 105 5 (1990) 463-470