|
Volumn 295, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1237-1238
|
Approval for pesticide toxicity testing in humans draws criticism
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
PESTICIDE;
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY;
DRUG APPROVAL;
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;
HEALTH CARE POLICY;
HEALTH HAZARD;
HUMAN;
HUMAN VERSUS ANIMAL COMPARISON;
INFORMATION;
NONHUMAN;
PEST CONTROL;
POPULATION RISK;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SHORT SURVEY;
TOXICITY TESTING;
UNITED STATES;
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ETHICS;
GOVERNMENT;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
HUMANS;
NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
PESTICIDES;
TOXICITY TESTS;
UNITED STATES;
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
|
EID: 33644979133
PISSN: 00987484
EISSN: 15383598
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.11.1237 Document Type: Short Survey |
Times cited : (1)
|
References (0)
|