Genetic differentiation of neutral markers and quantitative traits in predominantly selfing metapopulations: Confronting theory and experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana

Genetical Research

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-12

  Porcher, Emmanuelle ^a,b   Giraud, Tatiana ^a   Lavigne, Claire ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^c Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MATING SYSTEM; METAPOPULATION; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; PROCESS MODEL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SELFING; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 33644952572     PISSN: 00166723     EISSN: 14695073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0016672306007920     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bell, C. J. & Ecker, J. R. (1994). Assignment of 30 microsatellite loci to the linkage map of Arabidopsis. Genomics 19, 137-144.
2. Bonnin, I., Huguet, T., Gherardi, M., Prosperi, J. M. & Olivieri, I. (1996a). High level of polymorphism and spatial structure in a selfing plant species, Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae), shown using RAPD markers. American Journal of Botany 83, 843-855.
3. Bonnin, I., Prosperi, J. M. & Olivieri, I. (1996b). Genetic markers and quantitative genetic variation in Medicago truncatula (Leguminosae): A comparative analysis of population structure. Genetics 143, 1795-1805.
4. Bucheli, E., Gautschi, B. & Shykoff, J. A. (2001). Differences in population structure of the anther smut fungus Microbotryum violaceum on two closely related host species, Silene latifolia and S. dioica. Molecular Ecology 10, 285-294.
5. Charlesworth, B., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, D. (1993). The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134, 1289-1303.
6. Charlesworth, B., Nordborg, M. & Charlesworth, D. (1997). The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genetical Research 70, 155-174.
7. Crnokrak, P. & Merilä, J. (2002). Genetic population divergence: markers and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 501.
8. Falconer, D. S. (1960). Quantitative Genetics. New York: Ronald Press.
9. Farris, M. A. & Mitton, J. B. (1984). Population density, outcrossing rate and heterozygote superiority in Ponderosa pine. Evolution 38, 1151-1154.
10. Gomez-Mestre, I. & Tejedo, M. (2004). Contrasting patterns of quantitative and neutral genetic variation in locally adapted population of the natterjack toad, Bufo calamita. Evolution 58, 2343-2352.
11. Goudet, J. (1995). FSTAT (vers. 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86, 485-486.
12. Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M. (1991). Metapopulation dynamics. Brief history and conceptual domain. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42, 3-16.
13. Hedrick, P. W. (1987). Gametic disequilibrium measures: Proceed with caution. Genetics 117, 331-341.
14. Hendry, A. P. (2002). Qst > = ≠ < Fst? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 502.
15. Hereford, J., Hansen, T. F. & Houle, D. (2004). Comparing strengths of directional selection: How strong is strong? Evolution 58, 2133-2143.
16. Kingsolver, J. G., Hoekstra, H. E., Hoekstra, J. M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S. N., Hill, C. E., Hoang, A., Gibert, P. & Beerli, P. (2001). The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157, 245-261.
17. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1963). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17, 279-288.
18. Kimura, M., Maruyama, T. & Crow, J. F. (1963). The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48, 1460-1469.
19. Kuittinen, H., Mattila, A. & Savolainen, O. (1997). Genetic variation at marker loci and in quantitative traits in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 79, 144-152.
20. Lande, R. (1992). Neutral theory of quantitative genetic variance in an island model with local extinction and recolonization. Evolution 46, 381-389.
21. Latta, R. G. (1998). Differentiation of allelic frequencies at quantitative trait loci affecting locally adaptive traits. American Naturalist 151, 283-292.
22. Latta, R. G. & McKay, J. K. (2002). Genetic population divergence: markers and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 501-502.
23. Lavigne, C., Reboud, X., Lefranc, M., Porcher, E., Roux, F., Olivieri, I. & Godelle, B. (2001). Dynamic management of genetic resources in metapopulations: Arabidopsis thaliana as an experimental model. Genetics, Selection, Evolution 33, S399-S423.
24. Le Corre, V. & Kremer, A. (2003). Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait loci and trait in a subdivided population under selection. Genetics 164, 1205-1219.
25. Le Corre, V., Machon, N., Petit, R. J. & Kremer, A. (1997). Colonization with long-distance seed dispersal and genetic structure of maternally inherited genes in forest trees: A simulation study. Genetical Research 69, 117-125.
26. Levene, H. (1953). Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. American Naturalist 87, 331-333.
27. Lewontin, R. C. (1964). The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49, 49-67.
28. Liu, F., Zhang, L. & Charlesworth, D. (1998). Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265, 293-301.
29. Maynard-Smith, J. & Haigh, J. (1974). The hitch-hiking effect of a favorable gene. Genetical Research 231, 1114-1116.
30. McKay, J. K. & Latta, R. G. (2002). Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17, 285-291.
31. Merilä, J. & Crnokrak, P. (2001). Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 892-903.
32. Mitchell-Olds, T. (2001). Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: A model system for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 963-700.
33. Nordborg, M., Borevitz, J. O., Bergelson, J., Berry, C. C., Chory, J., Hagenblad, J., Kreitman, M., Maloof, J. N., Noyes, T., Oefner, P. J., Stahl, E. A. & Weigel, D. (2002). The extent of linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Genetics 30, 190-193.
34. Palo, J. U., O'Hara, R. B., Laugen, A. T., Laurila, A., Primmer, C. R. & Merilä, J. (2003). Latitudinal divergence of common frog (Rana temporaria) life history traits by natural selection: Evidence from a comparison of molecular and quantitative genetic data. Molecular Ecology 12, 963-978.
35. ST between allozymes and morphological traits. Genetics 140, 733-744.
36. Porcher, E., Giraud, T., Goldringer, I. & Lavigne, C. (2004a). Experimental demonstration of a causal relationship between heterogeneity of selection and genetic differentiation at quantitative traits. Evolution 58, 1434-1445.
37. Porcher, E., Gouyon, P.-H. & Lavigne, C. (2004b). Dynamic management of genetic resources: Maintenance of outcrossing in experimental metapopulations of a predominantly inbreeding species. Conservation Genetics 5, 259-269.
38. Rogers, A. R. (1986). Population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. American Naturalist 127, 729-730.
39. Saint-Laurent, R., Legault, M. & Bernatchez, L. (2003). Divergent selection maintains adaptive differentiation despite high gene flow between sympatric rainbow smelt ecotypes (Osmerus mordax Mitchill). Molecular Ecology 12, 315-330.
40. SAS Institute. (2000). SAS/STAT User Guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing.
41. Schluter, D. (2001). Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 372-380.
42. Spitze, K. (1993). Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: Quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135, 367-374.
43. Steinger, T., Haldimann, P., Leiss, K. A. & Müller-Schärer, H. (2002). Does natural selection promote population divergence? A comparative analysis of population structure using amplified fragment length polymorphism markers and quantitative traits. Molecular Ecology 11, 2583-2590.
44. Sunnucks, P. (2000). Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 199-203.
45. Tracey, M. L., Bellet, N. F. & Graven, C. B. (1975). Excess of allozyme homozygosity and breeding population structure in the mussel Mytilus californianus. Marine Biology 32, 303-311.
46. Via, S. (2001). Sympatric speciation in animals: The ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 381-390.
47. Watt, W. B., Donohue, K. & Carter, P. A. (1996). Adaptation at specific loci. VI. Diversity vs. parallelism of polymorphic allozymes in molecular function and fitness-component effects among Colias species (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 13, 699-709.
48. Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358-1370.
49. Whitlock, M. C. (1999). Neutral additive genetic variance in a metapopulation. Genetical Research 74, 215-221.
50. Widen, B., Andersson, S., Rao, G.-Y. & Widen, M. (2002). Population divergence of genetic (co)variance matrices in a subdivided plant species, Brassica cretica. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15, 961-970.
51. Wright, S. (1951). The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323-354.
52. Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 2. The Theory of Gene Frequencies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.