Modeling of non-linear relations among different design and manufacturing evaluation measures for multiobjective optimal concurrent design

Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 43-53

  Yang, H ^a   Xue, D ^a   Tu, Y L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Concurrent design; Design performance; Least square curve fitting; Manufacturing cost; Multiobjective optimization; Pair wise comparison method

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURVE FITTING; DESIGN; EVALUATION; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MANUFACTURE; OPTIMIZATION;

CONCURRENT DESIGN; DESIGN PERFORMANCE; MANUFACTURING COST; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON METHOD;

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING;

EID: 33644951187     PISSN: 1063293X     EISSN: 15312003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1063293X06063842     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kusiak, A. (ed.) (1993). Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals: Volume I, NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
3. Bralla, J.G. (ed.) (1986). Handbook of Product Design for Manufacturing, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4. Dong, Z. (1993). Design for Automated Manufacturing, In: Kusiak, A. (ed.), Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 207-234.
5. Boothroyd, G. and Dewhurst, P. (1983). Design for Assembly: A Designer's Handbook, Wakefield, RI: Boothroyd Dewhurst Inc.
6. Makino, A., Barkan, P. and Pfaff, R. (1989). Design for Serviceability, In: Proceedings of the 1989 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
7. Gershenson, J. and Ishii, K. (1993). Life-cycle Serviceability Design, In: Kusiak, A. (ed.), Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 363-384.
8. Zhang, H.C., Kuo, T.C., Lu, H. and Huang, S.H. (1997). Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 16(5): 352-371.
9. Roman, B., Statnikov, J. and Matusov, J.B. (1995). Multicriteria Optimization and Engineering, New York: Chapman and Hall.
10. Wang, G.G. and Shan, S. (2004). An Efficient Pareto Set Identification Approach for Multi-objective Optimization on Black-box Functions, In: Proceedings of The 2004 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah.
11. Ponnambalam, S.G., Jagannathan, H., Kataria, M. and Gadicherla, A. (2004). A TSP-GA Multi-objective Algorithm for Flow-shop Scheduling, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23(11-12): 909-915.
12. Farmani, R., Savic, D.A. and Walters, G.A. (2005). Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Water Distribution Network Design, Engineering Optimization, 37(2): 167-183.
13. Li, Y., Fadel, G.M. and Wiecek, M.M. (1998). Approximating Pareto Curves using the Hyper-ellipse, In: The 7-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Missouri.
14. Mistree, F., Hughes, O.F. and Bras, B.A. (1993). The Compromise Decision Support Problem and the Adaptive Linear Programming Algorithm, Structural Optimization: Status and Promise, AIAA, Washington, DC, 247 - 289.
15. Chen, W., Wiecek, M.M. and Zhang, J. (1998). Quality Utility - A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design, In: Proceedings of the 1998 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.
16. Xue, D. and Dong, Z. (1993). Feature Modeling Incorporating Tolerance and Production rocess for Concurrent Design, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 1(2): 107-116.
17. Xue, D. and Dong, Z. (1994). Developing a Quantitative Intelligent System for Implementing Concurrent Engineering Design, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 5(4): 251-267.
18. Xue, D., Rousseau, J.H. and Dong, Z. (1996). Joint Optimization of Performance and Costs in Integrated Concurrent Design: Tolerance Synthesis Part, Engineering Design and Automation, 2(1): 73-89.
19. Xue, D. and Dong, Z. (1998). Optimal Fuel Cell System Design Considering Functional Performance and Production Costs, Journal of Power Sources, 76(1): 69-80.
20. Hoffman, J.D. (1992). Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
22. Siddall, J.N. (1982). Optimal Engineering Design: Principles and Applications, New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc.