Femoral cementing techniques: Current trends in the UK

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 127-130

  Nedungayil, S K ^a,c   Mehendele, S ^b   Gheduzzi, S ^a   Learmoth, I D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone cements; Cementation; Hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; BONE CEMENT; GENTAMICIN BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; FEMUR; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISEASE; HUMAN; POSTAL MAIL; PRESERVATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TEMPERATURE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; CEMENTATION; DRUG STORAGE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644943595     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588406X94931     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kuhn KD. Bone cements. In: Up-to-date Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial Materials. Berlin: Springer, 2000; 236-7.
2. Klapach AS, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved cementing techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 1840-8.
3. McCaskie AW, Gregg PJ. Femoral cementing technique: current trends and future developments. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994; 76: 176-7.
4. Best AJ, Fender D, Harper WM, McCaskie AW, Oliver K, Gregg PJ. Current practice in primary total hip replacement: results from the National Hip Replacement Outcome Project. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998; 80: 350-5.
5. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Lie SA, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Vollset SE. Prospective studies of hip prostheses and cements. A presentation of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-1999. Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, March 15-19, Orlando, FL, 2000.
6. Espehaug B, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Havelin LI, Langsland N. Antibiotic prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 590-5.
7. Baleani M, Cristofolini L, Toni A. Temperature and ageing condition effects on the characterization of acrylic bone cement. Proc Inst Mech Eng 2001; 215: 113-8.
8. Farrar DF, Rose J. Rheological properties of PMMA bone cements during curing. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3005-13.
9. Lewis G. Effect of mixing method and storage temperature of cement constituents on the fatigue and porosity of acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomater) 1999; 48: 143-9.
10. Hansen D, Jensen JS. Prechilling and vacuum mixing not suitable for all bone cements - handling characteristics and exotherms of bone cements. J Arthroplasty 1990; 4: 287-90.
11. Joshi AB, Porter ML, Trail IA, Hunt LP, Murphy JC, Hardinge K. Long term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 616-23.
12. Callaghan JJ, Albright JC, Goetz DD, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 487-96.
13. Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC. The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 961-75.
14. Hashemi-Nejad A, Birch NC, Goddard NJ. Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76: 396-400.
15. Malachau H, Herberts P, Garellick G, Söderman P, Eisler T. Prognosis of total hip replacement, update and validation of results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Registry 1979-2000. 69th Annual Meeting of the AAOS, February 2002, Dallas, TX, 2002.