Automation adoption and adaptation: Case study of user request evaluation tool

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1915, 2005, Pages 62-68

  Bolic, Tatjana ^a   Hansen, Mark ^a  

^a 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER; USER INTERFACES;

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS; USER REQUEST EVALUATION TOOL (URET); USER-BENEFICIAL CONTROL ACTIONS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 33644936893     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1915-08     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Rogers,E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York, 2003.
2. Kirk, D. B. Enhanced Trial Planning and Problem Resolution Tools to Support Free Flight Operations. Report MP00W0000293. MITRE Corporation, McLean, Va., Oct. 2002.
3. Nolan,M. S. Fundamentals of Air Traffic Control. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif., 1990.
4. Garland, D. J., J. A. Wise, and V. D. Hopkin. Handbook of Aviation Human Factors. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., 1999.
5. Smolensky, M. W., and E. S. Stein. Human Factors in Air Traffic Control. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1998.
6. Wickens, C. D., A. S. Mavor, R. Parasuraman, and J. P. McGee, eds. The Future of Air Traffic Control: Human Operators and Automation. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1998.
7. Bolic, T., and M. Hansen. Assessing URET Benefits for Airspace Users: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. Research Report UCB-ITS-RR-2002-3. NEXTOR, University of California, Berkeley, April 2002.
8. Winokur, D. J. User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) Delivery 3.3 Training Materials. MITRE Technical Report 00W0000099. MITRE Corporation, McLean, Va., Sept. 2000.