Comparison of coronary angiography between 64-slice and 16-slice spiral CT

Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 26-31

  Wang, Ying Ning ^a   Jin, Zheng Yu ^a   Kong, Ling Yan ^a   Zhang, Zhu Hua ^a   Song, Lan ^a   Zhang, Shu Yang ^a   Zhang, Li Ren ^a   Lin, Song Bai ^a   Wang, Yun ^a   Zhao, Wen Min ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary artery diseases; Tomography; X ray computed

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TACHYCARDIA; TIME;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 33644934705     PISSN: 1000503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation, 2003, 107(5) :664-666.
2. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 43 ( 12) :2265-2270.
3. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A, et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(12) :1043-1048.
4. Detre KM, Wright E, Murphy ML, et al. Observer agreement in evaluating coronary angiograms. Circulation, 1975, 52 (6) :979-986.
5. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, et al. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo, 2004, 176(12) :1803-1810.
6. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation, 2002, 106 (16) :2051-2054.
7. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005, 45 (1) :128-132.
8. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A, et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology, 2004, 233(3) :817-823.
9. Hoffman U, Moselewski F, Cury RC, et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector piral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease, Circulation, 2004, 110 (17) :2638-2643.
10. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM, et al. CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology, 2004, 232(1) :18-37.