The myth of the biopsychosocial model [2]

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 277-278

  McLaren, N ^a  

^a Northern Psychiatric Services   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LETTER; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOSOCIAL CARE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

AUSTRALIA; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIND-BODY RELATIONS (METAPHYSICS); MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33644923816     PISSN: 00048674     EISSN: 14401614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01786_2.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. De Jonge P, Huyse FJ, Slaets JPJ, Soellner W, Stiefel FC.Operationalisation of biopsychosocial case complexity in general health care: The INTERMED project. Australian and New ZealandJournal of Psychiatry 2005; 39:795-799.
2. McLaren N. A critical review of the biopsychosocial model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1998; 32: 86-92.
3. Taylor GJ. Mind-body-environment: George Engel's psychoanalytic approach to psychosomatic medicine. Australianand New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 36: 449-457.
4. Singh BS. George Engel: A personal reminiscence. Australian and Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 36: 467-471.
5. McLaren N. The biopsychosocial model and scientific fraud.Paper presented to annual congress, RANZCP, Christchurch, May, 2004. Available from the author.