Simple graphical methods of displaying multiple clinical results

Pharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 51-60

  Squassante, Lisa ^a   Robinson, C N ^b   Palmer, R L ^c  

^a GSK   (Italy)

^b ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bulls eye plots; Clinical trials; Correlogram; EEG map; Frenchay Dysarthria Assessment ratings; Graphical methods; Star plot

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSARTHRIA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; HAMILTON SCALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN; POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYNDROME SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SPEECH ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

CLINICAL TRIALS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEART; HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH THERAPY;

EID: 33644914728     PISSN: 15391604     EISSN: 15391612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pst.199     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Friendly M. Gallery of Data Visualization, http://www.math.yorku.ca/SCS/Gallery (date last accessed: 1 December 2005).
2. Emerson JD, Strenio J. Boxplots and batch comparison. In Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis, Hoaglin DC, Mosteller F (eds). Wiley: New York, NY, 1983; pp. 58-96.
3. Knott VJ. Quantitative EEG methods, measures in human psychopharmacological research. Human Psychopharmacology 2000; 15:479-498.
4. Herrmann WM et al. International pharmaco-EEG group (IPEG). Recommendations for EEG and evoked potential mapping. Neuropsychobiology 1989; 22:170-176.
5. Nuwer MR, Quantitative EEG: I. Techniques and problems of frequency analysis and topographical mapping. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1988; 5:1-43.
6. Abt K. Statistical aspects of neurophysiologic topography. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1990; 7:514-534.
7. SAS/GRAPH (Version 8). SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC, 2000.
8. Garcia EV, Van Train K, Maddahi J et al. Quantitation of rotational thallium-201 myocardial perfusion tomography. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1985; 26:17-26.
9. DePasquale EE, Noby AC, DePuey EG et al. Quantitative rotational thallium-201 tomography for identifying and localising coronary artery disease. Circulation 1988; 77:316-327.
10. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
11. Enderby P. Frenchay dysarthria assessment. Texax, Pro-Ed, 1983.
12. Kay SR, Fizbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1987; 13:261-276.
13. Ventura J, Nuechterlein KH, Subtonik KL, Gutkind D, Gilbert EA. Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal component analysis of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychiatry Research 2000; 97:129-135.
14. Fienberg SE. Graphical methods in statistics. The American Statistician 1979; 33:165-178.
15. Schmid CF. Handbook of graphic presentation. Ronald Press: New York, 1954.