Assessment of a group-housing system for gestating sows: Effects of space allowance and pen size on the incidence of superficial skin lesions, changes in body condition, and farrowing performance

Journal of Swine Health and Production

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 89-96

  Seguin M J ^a   Barney, D ^b   Widowski, T M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b TORONTO ZOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Body condition; Farrowing performance; Gestating sows; Group housing; Swine

Indexed keywords

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33644905297     PISSN: 1537209X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gonyou HW. The social behaviour of pigs. In: Keeling LJ, Gonyou HW, eds. Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. Wallingford, UK: CABI International; 2001:147-176.
2. Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Jongman EC, Hutson GD. A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52:1-28.
3. Jensen P. Effects of confinement on social interaction patterns in dry sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1984;12:93-101.
4. Gonyou HW. Group housing: Alternative systems, alternative management. Adv Pork Prod. 2003;14:101-107.
5. Kongsted AG. Stress and fear as possible mediators of reproduction problems in group housed sows: A review. Acta Agric Scand Sect A, Anim Sci. 2004;54:58-66.
6. Arey DS. Time course for the formation and disruption of social organisation in group-housed sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999;62:199-207.
7. Mount NC, Seabrook ME A study of aggression when group housed sows are mixed. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993;36:377-383.
8. Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Newman EA, McCallum TH, Chilton D. Effects of pen size, partial stalls and method of feeding on welfare-related behavioural and physiological responses of group-housed pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1992;34:207-220.
9. Barnett JL, Cronin GM, McCallum TH, Newman EA. Effects of food and time of day on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1994;39:339-347.
10. Barnett JL, Cronin GM, McCallum TH, Newman EA, Hennessy OP. Effects of grouping unfamiliar adult pigs after dark, after treatment with amperozide and by using pens with stalls, on aggression, skin lesions and plasma cortisol concentrations. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1996;50:121-133.
11. Séguin MJ, Friendship RM, Kirkwood RN, Zanella AJ, Widowski TM. Effects of boar presence on agonistic behaviot, shoulder scratches and stress response of bred sows at mixing. J Anim Sci. In press.
12. Leeb B, Leeb C, Troxler J, Schuh M. Skin lesions and callosities in group-housed pregnant sows: Animal-related welfare indicators. Acta Agric Scand Sect A, Anim Sci. 2001;30(Suppl):82-87.
13. Swine Welfare Assurance Program. CWP #3 Animal Observation. Des Moines, Iowa: National Pork Board; 2003:12-17.
14. Barnett JL, Cronin GM, McCallum TH, Newman EA. Effects of pen size/shape and design on aggression when grouping unfamiliar adult pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1993;36:111-122.
15. Weng RC, Edwards SA, English PR. Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;59:307-316.
16. Brouns F, Edwards SA. Social rank and feeding behaviour of group-housed sows fed competitively or ad libitum. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1994;39:225-235.
17. Edwards SA, Mauchline S, Stewart AH. Designing pens to minimize aggression when sows are mixed. Farm Building Prog. 1993;113:20-23.
18. Edwards SA, Mauchline S, Marston GC, Stewart AH. Agonistic behaviour amongst newly mixed sows and the effects of pen design and feeding method [abstract]. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1994;41:272.
19. Csermely D, Wood-Gush DGM. Aggressive behaviour of grouped sows in different contexts. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1987;17:368-369.
20. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. The Recommended Codes of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farm Animals: Pigs. Publication 1898/E. Communications Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario; 1993.
21. nd ed. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: Prairie Swine Centre; 1995.
22. Hodgkiss NJ, Eddison JC, Brooks PH, Bugg P. Assessment of the injuries sustained by pregnant sows housed in groups using electronic feeders. Vet Rec. 1998;143:604-607.
23. de Koning R. Injuries in confined sows: Incidence and relation with behaviour. Ann Rech Vet. 1984;15:205-214.
24. McGlone JJ, Newby BE. Space requirements for finishing pigs in confinement: behavior and performance while group size and space vary. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1994;39:331-338.
25. Grandin T. Livestock behavior as related to handling facilities design. Int J Stud Anim Prob. 1980;1:33-52.
26. Arey DS, Edwards SA. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livest Prod Sci. 1998;56:61-70.
27. Edwards SA, Simmins PH, Walker AJ, Beckett MP. Behaviour of 400 sows in a single group with electronic individual feeding. Proc Int Symp Appl Ethol Farm Anim. Balantonfured, Hungary. 1986;69-73.
28. Taylor IA, Barnett JL, Cronin GM. Optimum group size for pigs. In: Bottcher KW, Hoff SJ, eds. Livestock Environment V. Proc Am Soc Agric Eng. Bloomington, Minnesota. 1997:965-971.
29. Petherick JC. A biological basis foi the design of space in livestock housing. In: Baxtet SH, Baxter MR, MacCormack JAD, eds. Farm Animal Housing and Welfare. The Hague, the Nethetlands: Martinus Nijhoff; 1983:103-120.
30. Broom DM, Mendl MT, Zanella AJ. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim Sci. 1995;61:369-385.
31. McGlone JJ, von Borell EH, Deen J, Johnson AK, Levis DG, Meunier-Salaün M, Morrow J, Reeves D, Salak-Johnson JL, Sundberg PL. Review: Compilation of the scientific literature comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behavior, performance, and health. Prof Anim Sci. 2004;20:105-117.
32. Hemsworth HW. Social environment and reproduction. In: Cole DJA, Foxcroft GR, eds. Control of Pig Reproduction. London, England: Butterworth; 1982:585-601.
33. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL. Behavioral responses affecting gilt and sow teproduction. J Reprod Pert. 1990;40(Suppl):343-354.
34. England DC, Spurr DT. Litter size of swine confined during gestation. J Anim Sci. 1969;28:220-223.
35. Schmidt WE, Stevenson JS, Davis DL. Reproductive traits of sows penned individually or in groups until 35 days after breeding. J Anim Sci. 1985;60:755-759.
36. Bates RO, Edwards DB, Korthals RL. Sow performance when housed either in groups with electronic sow feeders or stalls. Livest Prod Sci. 2003;79:29-35.
37. den Hartog LA, Backus GB, Vermeer HM. Evaluation of housing systems for sows. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:1339-1344.
38. Marchant JN, Rudd AR, Broom DM. The effects of housing on heart rate of gestating sows during specific behaviours. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1997;55:67-78.
39. Marchant JN, Broom DM. Effects of dry sow housing conditions on muscle weight and bone strength. Anim Sci. 1996;62:105-113.
40. Ferket SL, Hacker RR. Effect of forced exercise during gestation on reproductive performance of sows. Can J Anim Sci. 1985;65:851-859.
41. Randall GB. Observation on parturition in the sow. II. Factors influencing stillbirth and perinatal mortality. Vet Rec. 1972;90:183-186.
42. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Coleman GJ, Hansen C. Effects of social environment on welfare status and sexual behaviour of female pigs. II. Effects of space allowance. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1986;16:259-267.