Biomass accumulation in rapidly growing loblolly pine and sweetgum

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 370-377

  Williams, Thomas M ^a   Gresham, Charles A ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crown biomass; Intensive culture; Liquidambar styraciflua; Marginal agriculture; Pinus taeda; Pipe model

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; FERTILIZERS; FORESTRY; IRRIGATION; PLANTS (BOTANY); VEGETATION;

CROWN BIOMASS; INTENSIVE CULTURE; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA; MARGINAL AGRICULTURE; PINUS TAEDA; PIPE MODEL;

BIOMASS;

AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; FERTILIZERS; FORESTRY; IRRIGATION; PLANTS (BOTANY); VEGETATION;

BIOMASS; CANOPY; GROWTH RATE; INTENSIVE CULTURE;

LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA; PINUS TAEDA;

EID: 33644903791     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.07.017     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Wear DW, Greis JG. Southern forest assessment. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS -53, 2002. 635pp.
2. Wear DW. Land use. In: Wear DW, Greis JG, editors. Southern forest assessment. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS -53, 2002. p 153-73.
3. Siry JP. Intensive timber management practices. In: Wear DW, Greis JG, editors. Southern forest assessment. USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, General Technical Report SRS -53, 2002. p. 327-40.
4. T.M. Williams, and C.A. Gresham Nitrogen accumulation and changes in nitrate leaching after 4 years of intensive culture on marginal agricultural land New Zealand Journal of Forest Science 30 1/2 2000 266 279
5. L.J. Sammuelson Influence of intensive culture on net photosynthesis and growth of sweetgum and loblolly pine seedlings Forest Science 44 1998 308 316
6. Saucier JH, Phillips DR, Willams Jr JG. Green weight, volume, board-foot and cord tables for major southern pine species. Georgia Forestry Commission, Atlanta, GA, 1981. 63pp.
7. A. Clark III, and M.A. Taras Comparison of aboveground biomass of the four major southern pines Forest Product Journal 26 1976 25 28
8. Saucier JR, Clark III A. Tables for estimating total tree and product weight and volume of major southern tree species groups. Southwide Energy Committee, American Pulpwood Association Inc., Washington, DC, 1985. 57pp.
9. Borders BE, Will RE, Hendrick RL, Markewitz D, Harrington T, Teskey RO, et al. Consortium for accelerated pine production studies (CAPPS): long-term trends in loblolly pine stand productivity and characteristics in Georgia. Genetics Technical Report SRS-48. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 2002. p. 591-2.
10. Burns PY, Hu SC. Ecological and silvicultural factors associated with rapid growth of loblolly pine stands. Genetics Technical Report SE-24. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, 1983. p. 261-8.
11. Bailey RL, Borders BE. Lobolly pine-pushing the limits of growth. CAPPS 1997-1. The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service, Forest Resources Publication, Athens GA, 1997. 8p.
12. A.E. Triarks, and J.D. Haywood Pinus taeda response of fertilization, herbaceous plant control, and woody plant control Forest Ecology and Management 14 1986 103 112
13. L. Laureysens, J. Bogaert, R. Blust, and R. Ceulemans Biomass production of 17 poplar clones in a short-rotation coppice culture on a waste disposal site and its relation to soil characteristics Forest Ecology and Management 187 2004 295 305
14. G. Deckmyn, L. Laureysens, J. Garcia, B. Muys, and Ceulemans Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS Biomass Bioenergy 26 2004 221 227
15. L. Laureysens, W. Deraedt, T. Indeherberge, and Ceulemans Population dynamics in a 6-year old coppice culture of poplar. I. Clonal differences in stool mortality, shoot dynamics, and shoot diameter distribution in relation to biomass production Biomass Bioenergy 24 2003 81 95
16. M. Labrecque, and T.L. Teodorescu High biomass yield achieved by Salix clones in SRIC following 3-year coppice rotations on abandoned farmland in southern Quebec, Canada Biomass Bioenergy 25 2003 135 146
17. R.F. Kopp, L.P. Abrahamson, E.H. White, T.A. Volk, C.A. Nowak, and R.C. Fillhart Willow biomass production during ten successive annual harvests Biomass Bioenergy 29 2001 1 7
18. R. Lemus, E.C. Brummer, K.M. Moore, N.E. Molstad, C.L. Burras, and M.B. Barker Biomass yield of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA Biomass Bioenergy 23 2002 433 442
19. R.H.E. Sims, T.G. Maiava, and B.T. Bullock Short rotation coppice tree species selection for woody biomass production in New Zealand Biomass Bioenergy 20 2001 329 335
20. K. Shinozaki, K. Yoda, K. Hozumi, and T. Kira A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory I. Basic analysis Japanese Journal of Ecology 14 1964 97 104
21. K. Shinozaki, K. Yoda, K. Hozumi, and T. Kira A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory II. Further evidence of the theory and its application in forest ecology Japanese Journal of Ecology 14 1964 133 139
22. C.C. Greir, and R.H. Waring Conifer foliage mass related to sapwood area Forest Science 20 1974 205 206
23. D. Whitehead The estimation of foliage area from sapwood basal area in Scots pine Forestry 51 1978 137 149
24. T.J. Dean, and J.N. Long Variation in sapwood area-leaf area relations within two stands of lodgepole pine Forest Science 32 1986 749 758
25. C.A. Blanche, J.D. Hodges, and T.E. Nebeker A leaf area sapwood area ratio developed to rate loblolly pine vigor Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15 1985 181 184
26. A. Albrektson Sapwood basal area and needle mass of Scots pine trees in central Sweden Forestry 57 1984 35 43
27. J.N. Long, F.W. Smith, and D.R.M. Scott The role of Douglas-fir stem sapwood and heartwood in the mechanical and physiological support of crown and development of stem form Canadian Journal of Forest Research 11 1981 459 464
28. D.G. Spurgel, T.M. Hinckley, and W. Schaap The theory and practice of branch autonomy Annual Revision of Ecology System 22 1991 309 334